2008
DOI: 10.1080/00207170802090177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-time non-linear flatness-based predictive control: an exact feedforward linearisation setting with an induction drive example

Abstract: To cite this article: V. Hagenmeyer & E. Delaleau (2008) Continuous-time non-linear flatness-based predictive control: an exact feedforward linearisation setting with an induction drive exampleA general flatness-based framework for non-linear continuous-time predictive control is presented. It extends the results of Fliess and Marquez (2000) to the non-linear case. The mathematical setting, which is valid for multivariable systems, is provided by the theory of flatness-based exact feedforward linearisation int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the nominal T ¤ i in (23) are expressed in function of the reference trajectories F ¤ i ,the profile of F ¤ i can be tuned to drive the system as fast as possible from an initial position to a final one without hitting actuator constraints. This profile depends on the coefficients a i j of the reference trajectories which are defined as polynomial functions of fixed degrees in (22) and (23). The coefficients are in function of the initial and final conditions as well as t 0 and t f where the final time t f is the sole unknown parameter and thus, they can be obtained by determining t f .…”
Section: A Fault-free Case: Minimal-time Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the nominal T ¤ i in (23) are expressed in function of the reference trajectories F ¤ i ,the profile of F ¤ i can be tuned to drive the system as fast as possible from an initial position to a final one without hitting actuator constraints. This profile depends on the coefficients a i j of the reference trajectories which are defined as polynomial functions of fixed degrees in (22) and (23). The coefficients are in function of the initial and final conditions as well as t 0 and t f where the final time t f is the sole unknown parameter and thus, they can be obtained by determining t f .…”
Section: A Fault-free Case: Minimal-time Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have to consider the load disturbance τ d which enters (5) via (14), we usē τ (t) = τ l +τ d (t) in (10), whereτ d (t) would be the "reference load disturbance" which obviously is unknown in advance, but may be handled as in [17]. This yields…”
Section: Trajectory Planning For the Combination Boost-converter/dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is differential flat if there exists such a flat output vector z(t) ∈ R m that has the following properties [21][22][23]:…”
Section: Quadrotor Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of differential flatness has been exploited to design feedforward control schemes for nonlinear systems [22][23][24], which normally form a specific combination of a nominal feedforward input and a local feedback controller. In this paper, the differential flatness property is adopted in the receding horizon framework to facilitate the online optimisation.…”
Section: Quadrotor Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%