Companion of the the Web Conference 2018 on the Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3184558.3191526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-Time Dynamic Network Embeddings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
232
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the methods that are not able to deal with time dependencies, i.e. node2vec, there are following two typical treatments: 1) only using G t−1 to infer G t [18]; or 2) aggregating previous 10 snapshots into a single network and then do link prediction [31], [45]. We choose the former one when implementing node2vec, because the relatively long sequence of historical snapshots here may carry some disturbing information that node2vec cannot handle, leading to even poor performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the methods that are not able to deal with time dependencies, i.e. node2vec, there are following two typical treatments: 1) only using G t−1 to infer G t [18]; or 2) aggregating previous 10 snapshots into a single network and then do link prediction [31], [45]. We choose the former one when implementing node2vec, because the relatively long sequence of historical snapshots here may carry some disturbing information that node2vec cannot handle, leading to even poor performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive overview of temporal graphs, their static representations, and temporal walks can be found in [12,21]. In [25] temporal random walks are used to obtain node embeddings for link prediction in evolving networks. In [9], the Katz centrality is extended to temporal graphs using temporal walks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, methods for dynamic graphs were proposed where edges may be added to the graph as time progresses. All of these approaches focus on link prediction in single graphs, see, e.g., [25,32]. Graph neural networks [8] emerged as an alternative for graph classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al [16], propose a model to incorporate temporal information when creating graph embeddings via random walks by capturing individual temporal changes within a graph. The authors propose a temporal random walk to create the input data, with the approach producing more complex and rich temporal walks via a biasing process.…”
Section: B Temporal Graph Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%