2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous theta burst stimulation over the supplementary motor area in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A randomized sham-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the sham group showed a mild but significant symptom improvement in our study. A similar phenomenon was also found in previous studies on OCD (Harika-Germaneau et al, 2019), depression (Li et al, 2020) and schizophrenia (Dollfus, Lecardeur, Morello, & Etard, 2016). These findings indicate a considerable placebo effect in patients with psychiatry disorders, and emphasize the importance of sham controls in rTMS studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly, the sham group showed a mild but significant symptom improvement in our study. A similar phenomenon was also found in previous studies on OCD (Harika-Germaneau et al, 2019), depression (Li et al, 2020) and schizophrenia (Dollfus, Lecardeur, Morello, & Etard, 2016). These findings indicate a considerable placebo effect in patients with psychiatry disorders, and emphasize the importance of sham controls in rTMS studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is not clear whether increasing the intensity of stimulation can enhance the efficacy. This study chose a stimulus intensity of 80% RMT used in most cTBS studies, but it may be somewhat insufficient in treatment-resistant OCD; d. We locate the OFC target convenient and straightforward through the international 10–20 EEG system, and this method is not as accurate as neuronavigation because of each person’s brain’s anatomical differences; e. The sample size of this study was small, and there may be high individual differences between responses to noninvasive brain stimulation regimens, including routine rTMS and TBS; 47 f. We used was a commonly used figure-of-8 shaped coil, which was also used in the studies of Dutta et al and Harika-Germaneau et al, 17 , 18 but did not achieve clinical efficacy. It may be due to the shallow penetration depth of the magnetic field, which cannot reach the depth of the target stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 33 , 34 Among the published randomized-controlled trials, only two have reported cTBS in treatment-resistant OCD, and the results showed that cTBS was not effective in treating obsessive symptoms, which was consistent with ours. 17 , 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent trial demonstrated superior efficacy of this protocol over antipsychotic augmentation in treatment-resistant OCD subjects (Pallanti et al, 2016). However, given recent inconsistent reports on inhibitory rTMS protocols targeting the SMA (Arumugham et al, 2018;Harika-Germaneau et al, 2019;Pelissolo et al, 2016), there is a need for large multicentre trials to confirm its efficacy at this location.…”
Section: Treatment-resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder -Noninvasimentioning
confidence: 99%