2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42417-021-00425-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Swept-Sine Vibration Realization Combining Adaptive Sliding Mode Control and Inverse Model Compensation for Electro-hydraulic Shake Table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x 3 = θ (2) x 4 = θ (3) x 5 = θ (4) (7) Establish the state-space expression for the closed-loop system:…”
Section: Determination Of Parameters To Be Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x 3 = θ (2) x 4 = θ (3) x 5 = θ (4) (7) Establish the state-space expression for the closed-loop system:…”
Section: Determination Of Parameters To Be Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have put forward ever increasingly stronger demands for high-performance hydraulic systems, which should be more reliable, precise, energy efficient, intelligent, and so on. Owing to structural and environmental factors, system parameters are easily affected, which makes it difficult to control systems and reduce the reliability of system operation [1][2][3][4]. Therefore, to avoid affecting the control performance of the servo system, multi-parameter identification of the nonlinear system is very important, and relevant personnel have made some meaningful attempts and explorations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electric shaking table is typical in the laboratory due to its small thrust and linearity; alternatively, the hydraulic shaking table is broadly utilized to conduct the full-scale seismic simulation, considering its ability to produce colossal forces. However, strong nonlinearity and uncertainty exist in the hydraulic shaking table system [7], such as servo-valve dynamics, dead zone, and friction, making it relatively tricky to design a hydraulic shaking table controller to replicate the shaking scenarios as accurately as possible [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%