2022
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2022-295
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks clearly outperform hydrological models

Abstract: Abstract. This study investigates the ability of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks to perform streamflow prediction at ungauged basins. A series of state-of-the-art, hydrological model-dependent regionalization methods is applied to 148 catchments in Northeast North America and compared to a LSTM model that uses the exact same available data as the hydrological models. While conceptual model-based methods attempt to derive parameterizations at ungauged sites from other similar or nearby catchments,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a range of papers (including those from authors of this manuscript) have shown that data-driven LSTM-based models clearly and consistently outperform existing traditional PC-based models for streamflow prediction, across a large variety of regions and scenarios (e.g., gauged (Kratzert, Klotz, Shalev, et al, 2019;Lees et al, 2021;Koch & Schneider, 2022;Gauch et al, 2021;Mai et al, 2022), ungauged (Kratzert, Klotz, Herrnegger, et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2021;Arsenault et al, 2022;Mai et al, 2022), and extreme events (Frame et al, 2022)). Despite these successes, parts of the scientific community have questioned the viability of LSTM-based models as "hydrologic" models in their own right (Razavi, 2021;Nearing et al, 2021)-as models that can not only provide better predictions, but that also advance hydrologic knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, a range of papers (including those from authors of this manuscript) have shown that data-driven LSTM-based models clearly and consistently outperform existing traditional PC-based models for streamflow prediction, across a large variety of regions and scenarios (e.g., gauged (Kratzert, Klotz, Shalev, et al, 2019;Lees et al, 2021;Koch & Schneider, 2022;Gauch et al, 2021;Mai et al, 2022), ungauged (Kratzert, Klotz, Herrnegger, et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2021;Arsenault et al, 2022;Mai et al, 2022), and extreme events (Frame et al, 2022)). Despite these successes, parts of the scientific community have questioned the viability of LSTM-based models as "hydrologic" models in their own right (Razavi, 2021;Nearing et al, 2021)-as models that can not only provide better predictions, but that also advance hydrologic knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The large number of available hydrologic models raises the obvious challenge of how one should evaluate and compare models when faced with the need to choose the most suitable model for a given task (e.g., Krause et al, 2005;Gupta et al, 2009;Moriasi et al, 2015;Garcia et al, 2017). Benchmark studies are one approach that can help address this problem, and thus have gained substantial traction (e.g., Best et al, 2015;Kratzert, Klotz, Shalev, et al, 2019;Lees et al, 2021;Mai et al, 2022;Arsenault et al, 2022). Overall, the community usually bases their strategy for model performance evaluation and comparison on sets of quantitative metrics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, surrogate models with different structures can be explored to compose the multi-model ensemble. Other recurrent algorithms commonly applied for river flow forecasting, such as the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) [46] and the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [47][48][49][50], are suggested alternatives for the NARX structure adopted in this work, while convolutional neural networks can be used to compose the flood inundation maps [51]. Additionally, Mosavi et al [52] (Section 4.2 of their work) listed a series of hybrid models already explored for short-term forecasting that potentially can be adapted for the prediction of flood inundation maps.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%