1994
DOI: 10.1177/0148558x9400900101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Signaling within Partitions: Capital Structure and the FIFO/LIFO Choice

Abstract: This paper considers a setting in which managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… The existence of separating equilibria can easily be shown, where high (low) quality firms choose the earnings minimizing (maximizing) accounting policy. The proof, which is available upon request, generalizes existing results from the dichotomous LIFO/FIFO case (Hughes et al, 1994). …”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“… The existence of separating equilibria can easily be shown, where high (low) quality firms choose the earnings minimizing (maximizing) accounting policy. The proof, which is available upon request, generalizes existing results from the dichotomous LIFO/FIFO case (Hughes et al, 1994). …”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Some earlier analytical work(Hughes et al 1988(Hughes et al , 1994 suggests that firms that choose FIFO might forego the benefit of switching to LIFO (if any) to provide a signal of superior performance to investors. However in this study, we do not examine the effect of inventory choice on performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the economic consequences of alternative accounting policies, and second, the role of the accounting standard setter in ensuring the provision of useful information contained in financial statements. From the perspective, of the former the literature indicates that firms use alternative accounting policies as a quality-signalling mechanism to the users of financial reports (Hand & Skantz, 1997;Hughes, Schwartz & Thakor, 1994). The objective of the quality-signalling is to influence users in their investment decision making process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%