2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(01)00075-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous separating families in ordered spaces and strong base conditions

Abstract: In this paper we study the role of Stepanova's continuous separating families in the class of linearly ordered and generalized ordered spaces and we construct examples of paracompact spaces that have strong base properties (such as point-countable bases or σ-disjoint bases), have continuous separating families, and yet are non-metrizable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As separability is finite multiplicative, X 2 is separable. Because X is a Hausdorff space, is closed in X and hence X 2 \ is an open subset of X 2 . We know that separability is hereditary with respect to open subsets, so X 2 \ is also separable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As separability is finite multiplicative, X 2 is separable. Because X is a Hausdorff space, is closed in X and hence X 2 \ is an open subset of X 2 . We know that separability is hereditary with respect to open subsets, so X 2 \ is also separable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, applying Theorem 2.1, we know that X has a weaker metric topology. Using [ [2]. They proved it only for generalized ordered spaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao and W.-X. Shi [2] Let X be a generalized ordered (GO) space with the underlying linearly ordered topological space X u , let X * be the minimal closed linearly ordered extension of X andX be the minimal dense linearly ordered extension of X . Clearly, separability, countable chain condition and Lindelöfness of X can be preserved byX .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these properties of X are not hereditary toX (see [5]). Since the Sorgenfrey line S and the Michael line M are submetrizable they have the continuous Urysohn property P. M * has P [2], but S * andS do not have P [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%