1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90187-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults: A validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
148
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
148
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Older adults with self-reported physical limitation had a CS-PFP score of 23.6 Ϯ 8.6 and a SIP total score of 15.15 Ϯ 12. 4 We acknowledge limitations to this study. Our sample size was small and did not permit us to examine differences across diagnostic categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 Older adults with self-reported physical limitation had a CS-PFP score of 23.6 Ϯ 8.6 and a SIP total score of 15.15 Ϯ 12. 4 We acknowledge limitations to this study. Our sample size was small and did not permit us to examine differences across diagnostic categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The CS-PFP, a valid and sensitive measure of physical function, has been used to characterize function in older adults with a broad range of ability. 4 The CS-PFP includes 16 everyday tasks important in independent living. The tasks are listed in Table 2 and a full description of the test is published elsewhere, 4,5 with detailed information available at www.coe.uga.edu/cspfp.…”
Section: Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The test has been validated for use in older populations (5,4), and the reproducibility of the CS-PFP10 scores and subscales are very good, with intraclass correlation coefficients in the range of r = 0.79 to 0.94; and (c) the visual analog dyspnea scale (VAS) measured dyspnea. Immediately upon completion of the CS-PFP10 participants were instructed to indicate their degree of breathlessness by marking along the 10cm horizontal line.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%