This study aimed to analyse the anticoagulation effect of different local infusion methods for citrate continuous haemodialysis in critically ill patients in order to identify a safe and effective citrate infusion method. Critically ill patients admitted to our hospital from April 2019 to December 2019 who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using citrate for anticoagulation were divided into the conventional citrate infusion before the filter (conventional group) and citrate infusion group according to the different local citrate infusion methods (modified group). A total of 30 treatment sessions were performed for each group. the modified group patients were found to have longer mean treatment times(67.67 ± 18.69 vs 52.11 ± 24.26,p = 0.007), lower transmembrane pressures at the disconnection time from dialysis circuit(147.77 ± 66.85 vs 200.63 ± 118.66,p = 0.038), fewer citrate bag replacements(1.43 ± 0.50 vs 10.60 ± 3.19,p < 0.001), and steady ionised calcium at the venous end compared to the conventional group patients with statistically significant differences(0.35 ± 0.06 vs 0.40 ± 0.05,p = 0.006). The total calcium level was significantly higher in the conventional group patients than those of the other(2.29 ± 0.23 vs 2.19 ± 0.14,p = 0.038). Incidences of citrate accumulation and tubing coagulation were also marginally lower in the modified group. We infer that the modified local citrate infusion method can prolong the treatment time, reduce the nursing workload and the occurrence of citrate accumulation, resulting in safe and effective clinical outcome.