1968
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0217:cpspbo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Point Source Plume Behavior Out to 160 Miles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (b) above the fact that the standard deviation, o(x,z,t,y), depends on y has been indicated explicitly since this will be significant in the comparison presented later. The experimental concentration data by Peterson (1968) are given with an arbitrary normalization.…”
Section: M1n Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In (b) above the fact that the standard deviation, o(x,z,t,y), depends on y has been indicated explicitly since this will be significant in the comparison presented later. The experimental concentration data by Peterson (1968) are given with an arbitrary normalization.…”
Section: M1n Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering a large number of individual tracer particle trajectories, the spatial and time variations of a plume may be determined. In their paper, Watson and Barr considered only instantaneous sources, but it is straightforward to adapt their model, * A comparison between results obtained with the diffusion model code ATM (Culkowski and Patterson, 1976) and the experimental data of Peterson (1968) is ~riven inAppend1x 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the goals of field studies on plume emissions has been to outline the plume dimensions, 4 ' 5 so as to better determine the pollutant dispersion pattern. Early attempts at tracking plumes relied heavily on photography 6 ' 7 and in situ ground-based or aircraft sampling of the aerosol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts at tracking plumes relied heavily on photography 6 ' 7 and in situ ground-based or aircraft sampling of the aerosol. 4 ' 8 ' 9 However, turbulent mixing of the effluents may frequently cause the plume to quickly disappear from sight, often limiting the first method to short distances downwind. 10 The second method usually derives only a small portion of the information necessary to describe the plume in detail.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%