1972
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(72)90412-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous observation of deposition processes by controlled atmosphere electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, low catalyst activity and faster catalyst poisoning result in low yield of the grown carbon nanospecies. The slowdown in the growth rate is attributed to progressive blocking of the active surface by excess carbon deposition on the front face of the catalyst particle [24]. At temperatures~700°C the catalyst activity is increased and the catalyst poisoning effect is delayed/suppressed thus effective growth time is increased which leads to higher yield.…”
Section: Influence Of Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, low catalyst activity and faster catalyst poisoning result in low yield of the grown carbon nanospecies. The slowdown in the growth rate is attributed to progressive blocking of the active surface by excess carbon deposition on the front face of the catalyst particle [24]. At temperatures~700°C the catalyst activity is increased and the catalyst poisoning effect is delayed/suppressed thus effective growth time is increased which leads to higher yield.…”
Section: Influence Of Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNTs are thought to be formed by a modified version of the vapour-liquid-solid mechanism proposed by Baker et al [21,22]. A vapoursolid-solid mechanism has been proposed where carbon dissociates on the surface of a catalyst particle, diffuses across its surface and finally precipitates in the form of CNTs [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the investigators cited do not attribute the change of shape to melting or surface melting of catalyst nanoparticles, which could provide a plausible explanation. Long back, Baker et al [9] in their in situ experiments inside TEM using nickel catalyst and acetylene at 600°C have observed that there is change in shape of the catalyst during the growth of carbon nanofiber (CNF) and attributed it to vapor-liquidsolid (VLS) mechanism of growth. Their estimate of activation energy for growth is similar to the activation energy for diffusion of carbon in liquid nickel, and it has been inferred that the fiber growth is diffusion-controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%