2021
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s306896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Negative Pressure Drainage with Intermittent Irrigation Leaded to a Risk Reduction of Perineal Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Purpose High rate of perineal surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication following abdominoperineal resection (APR), especially for extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous negative pressure drainage combined with intermittent irrigation (CNPDCII) in the presacral space on the perineal SSI following laparoscopic ELAPE for low rectal cancer. Patients and Methods The clinical d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the most common surgical procedures that patients underwent were low anterior resection, colectomy and abdominoperineal resection (see Table 2). Most interventions were delivered in academic (Arslan et al., 2020; Chadi et al., 2014; Cima et al., 2013; Curchod et al., 2022; Curran et al., 2019; Forsmo et al., 2016; Han et al., 2021; Keenan et al., 2014, 2015; Martinez et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2015; Park et al., 2020; Poehnert et al., 2017; Tanner et al., 2016; Wierdak et al., 2021) and tertiary facilities (Carrano et al., 2021; Chadi et al., 2014; Cima et al., 2013; D'Souza et al., 2019; Keenan et al., 2014, 2015; Martinez et al., 2020; Ocaña Jiménez et al., 2019; Park et al., 2020; Poehnert et al., 2017; Wierdak et al., 2021). The units where interventions/quality improvement initiatives were delivered were surgical (Hewitt et al., 2017; Pellino, Sciaudone, Candilio, de Fatico, et al., 2014; Selvaggi et al., 2014; Watanabe et al., 2017), colorectal (Gorgun et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2015; Shakeshaft et al., 2020), gastroenterology (Han et al., 2021) and general surgical units (Arslan et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common surgical procedures that patients underwent were low anterior resection, colectomy and abdominoperineal resection (see Table 2). Most interventions were delivered in academic (Arslan et al., 2020; Chadi et al., 2014; Cima et al., 2013; Curchod et al., 2022; Curran et al., 2019; Forsmo et al., 2016; Han et al., 2021; Keenan et al., 2014, 2015; Martinez et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2015; Park et al., 2020; Poehnert et al., 2017; Tanner et al., 2016; Wierdak et al., 2021) and tertiary facilities (Carrano et al., 2021; Chadi et al., 2014; Cima et al., 2013; D'Souza et al., 2019; Keenan et al., 2014, 2015; Martinez et al., 2020; Ocaña Jiménez et al., 2019; Park et al., 2020; Poehnert et al., 2017; Wierdak et al., 2021). The units where interventions/quality improvement initiatives were delivered were surgical (Hewitt et al., 2017; Pellino, Sciaudone, Candilio, de Fatico, et al., 2014; Selvaggi et al., 2014; Watanabe et al., 2017), colorectal (Gorgun et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2015; Shakeshaft et al., 2020), gastroenterology (Han et al., 2021) and general surgical units (Arslan et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various drainage methods, including continuous pelvic irrigation and drainage, continuous irrigation and drainage through the anal catheter, combined pelvic irrigation and drainage through anus, and endoscopic transanal rectal closure with negative-pressure drainage. 23–27 These drainage methods all focus on the design of the drainage tube and the selection of the drainage method. Few people assess the anastomosis and leakage before drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted NPWTi-d for mild-moderate omphalocele case because we expected that NPWTi-d contributed to reducing the incidence of infection. Prophylactic NPWTi-d has not fully demonstrated effectiveness in preventing infection; however, the effectiveness of NPWTi-d in reducing surgical site infection has recently been reported [ 30 ]. NPWTi-d is theoretically effective in preventing infection; hence, routine use of NPWTi-d can contribute to decreasing infection in mild-moderate omphalocele cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%