2015
DOI: 10.1111/pan.12679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring with the COstatus in a neonatal swine model: recalibration is necessary during vasoconstriction and vasodilation

Abstract: Continuous cardiac output (CO) measured with the COstatus monitor requires recalibration during vasoconstriction and vasodilation, even if changes in COTPUD or SVR are not substantial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in vasomotor activity or blood volume may affect the relationship between the arterial waveform and the stroke volume, and might require recalibration, even when different technologies are used. 14,15 We have shown previously that even small changes in blood pressure, that did not affect the CO, affected the calculations of CO and SV based on waveform analysis. 14 This study was designed primarily to assess the ability of these monitoring modalities to detect changes in blood volume, hence SVV was obtained from a monitor that was not recalibrated at each change in blood volume and this likely contributed to inaccuracy errors in the SVV measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in vasomotor activity or blood volume may affect the relationship between the arterial waveform and the stroke volume, and might require recalibration, even when different technologies are used. 14,15 We have shown previously that even small changes in blood pressure, that did not affect the CO, affected the calculations of CO and SV based on waveform analysis. 14 This study was designed primarily to assess the ability of these monitoring modalities to detect changes in blood volume, hence SVV was obtained from a monitor that was not recalibrated at each change in blood volume and this likely contributed to inaccuracy errors in the SVV measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The monitor can then calculate the SV from the arterial pressure waveform, utilizing the systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures, as well as the heart rate. Changes in vasomotor activity or blood volume may affect the relationship between the arterial waveform and the stroke volume, and might require recalibration, even when different technologies are used . We have shown previously that even small changes in blood pressure, that did not affect the CO, affected the calculations of CO and SV based on waveform analysis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COstatus system is also well validated in paediatric patients [68,69]. Recalibration however is needed in unstable conditions [70].…”
Section: Co = (V Inj ) / ∫ (Ca(t)dtmentioning
confidence: 99%