2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01142j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves

Abstract: Despite increasing demand in the manipulation of nanoscale objects for next generation biological and industrial processes, there is a lack of methods for reliable separation, concentration and purification of nanoscale objects. Acoustic methods have proven their utility in contactless manipulation of microscale objects mainly relying on the acoustic radiation effect, though the influence of acoustic streaming has typically prevented manipulation at smaller length scales. In this work, however, we explicitly t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
140
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For microparticles below a critical size, * weiqiu@fysik.dtu.dk † bruus@fysik.dtu.dk ‡ per.augustsson@bme.lth.se the motion of microparticles is dominated by acoustic streaming, which in many cases hinders the manipulation of sub-micrometer sized particles. Manipulation below the classical limit has previously been demonstrated by flow vortices generated by two-dimensional acoustic fields [29,30], by acoustically active seed particles [24], by a thin reflector design [31], or in systems actuated by surface acoustic waves [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microparticles below a critical size, * weiqiu@fysik.dtu.dk † bruus@fysik.dtu.dk ‡ per.augustsson@bme.lth.se the motion of microparticles is dominated by acoustic streaming, which in many cases hinders the manipulation of sub-micrometer sized particles. Manipulation below the classical limit has previously been demonstrated by flow vortices generated by two-dimensional acoustic fields [29,30], by acoustically active seed particles [24], by a thin reflector design [31], or in systems actuated by surface acoustic waves [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, acoustic streaming has been a major show-stopper in the successful acoustophoretic manipulation of bioparticles such as exosomes, vira, and small bacteria [32], the reason being the unfavorable scalings of the acoustic radiation force and the streaminginduced drag force with smaller particle sizes [22,33]. Already, there have been attempts to suppress acoustic streaming using pulsed actuation [34,35], or to engineer streaming patterns in special geometries that allow nanoparticle manipulation [36][37][38]. In this work, we use the standard chip design sketched in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attenuation coefficients in the fluid α is given by α=ρcρscsλwhere ρ s and c s are the density and leaky SAW velocity of the substrate (ρ s = 4628 kg m −3 , c s = 3931 ms −1 ), ρ and c are the density and leaky SAW velocity of water (ρ = 1000 kg m −3 , c = 1500 ms −1 ), and ρ is the SAW wavelength. For fluid with a length l , the FSAW beam that radiation into the fluid can be given by Es=Efalse(1eαlfalse)where E is the energy FSAW, E s is the energy that radiation into fluid. The body force FB is proportion to E s .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%