1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(96)00102-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous measurements of outdoor radon concentrations at various locations in East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous detectors relied upon the use of radon progeny as a radon proxy, a technique that necessitates concomitant assumptions regarding equilibrium, or establishing the degree of disequilibrium, of the progeny with respect to the ambient radon (Lambert et al, 1970;Larson, 1973;Wilkniss et al, 1973). The sophistication of detectors for direct radon monitoring rapidly increased (Whittlestone and Zahorowski, 1995;Iida et al, 1996;Whittlestone and Zahorowski, 1998), such that their lower limit of detection was suitable for monitoring radon concentration in marine air, and their response time was suitable for observing synoptic scale events.…”
Section: Historical Background: Radon Monitoring and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous detectors relied upon the use of radon progeny as a radon proxy, a technique that necessitates concomitant assumptions regarding equilibrium, or establishing the degree of disequilibrium, of the progeny with respect to the ambient radon (Lambert et al, 1970;Larson, 1973;Wilkniss et al, 1973). The sophistication of detectors for direct radon monitoring rapidly increased (Whittlestone and Zahorowski, 1995;Iida et al, 1996;Whittlestone and Zahorowski, 1998), such that their lower limit of detection was suitable for monitoring radon concentration in marine air, and their response time was suitable for observing synoptic scale events.…”
Section: Historical Background: Radon Monitoring and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the two-filter detector we used, is not the only instrument measuring atmospheric 222 Rn instead of atmospheric 222 Rn progeny. Other instruments include those based on the design by Iida et al (1996) and widely used in East Asia (e.g. Moriizumi et al, 2008), and the two filter detector developed by the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) as described in Collé et al (1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in this study were measured with an electrostatic radon monitor, which had a minimum detection limit of 0.3 Bq m -3 for hourly averaged concentrations. 2) The measured concentration at Hachijo Island in 2006 averaged about 1.5 Bq m -3 , with a variation from the detection limit to values as high as about 5.0 Bq m -3 .…”
Section: Atmospheric 222 Rn Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 94%