Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring via the shunt reservoir to assess suspected shunt malfunction in adults with hydrocephalus

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Object</jats:title> <jats:p>The authors attempted to determine whether continuous intracrnial pressure monitoring via the shunt resevoir identifies ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt malfunctions that are not identified by radionuclide shunt patency study or shunt tap in adults with hydrocephalus.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>During a 2-year period, 26 adults underwent 32 in-hospital continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring evaluations via needle access of a shunt reservoir. Monitoring was performed for 26.8 ± 13.8 hours (mean ± standard deviation). No ICP waveform abnormality was detected in 31% of the evaluations (10 of 32). In contrast, abnormalities were detected in 69% (22 of 32 evaluations), including B waves (nine of 22 evaluations), siphoning (nine of 22 evaluations), and variable ICP (two of 22 evaluations). In 20 (91%) of these 22 evaluations, the ICP abnormality was detected only after continuous ICP monitoring; in the other two evaluations, ICP became abnormal immediately on accessing the shunt reservoir. On the basis of the ICP monitoring results, shunt revision was performed in 66% (21 of 32 evaluations) and medical therapy was administered in 34% (11 of 32 evaluations). Shunt revision led to symptom improvement in 82% (18 of 22 patients) and no change in 18% (four of 22 patients); medical therapy led to improvement in 18% (two of 11 patients), worsening in 18% (two of 11 patients), and no change in 64% (seven of 11 patients; p &lt; 0.05).</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Continuous ICP monitoring via the shunt reservoir provides a more accurate assessment of shunt malfunction than transient ICP monitoring with a shunt tap or a radionuclide shunt patency study. It is a safe method for evaluating patients with suspected VP shunt malfunction, provides in vivo assessment of the effect of the shunt system on a patient's ICP, and can lead to more effective shunt revision.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Pedicle Screw-Based Posterior Dynamic Stabilization: Literature Review

“…The device was developed in Seoul, Korea. This device has been used most commonly in conjunction with interbody cages to achieve fusion, although it has also been used as a stand-alone nonfusion device [34]. Recently, a titanium version of the device has been approved by the FDA under 510 (k) as a fusion device, but no clinical use in the US has been reported yet.…”

Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury

“…A significant reason for death and long-term disability due to head injuries and other intracranial pathological conditions is an elevation in the ICP. ICP monitoring has proven to be valuable, indeed often lifesaving, in the acute care of TBI [ 13 ], hydrocephalus [ 14 ], drowning [ 15 ] inflammatory and related cerebral diseases such as Reye’s syndrome [ 16 ], intracranial hemorrhage [ 17 ], cryptococcal meningitis [ 18 ], and postoperative sub-occipital brain tumors [ 19 ]. Most of these patients have headaches and other symptoms suggestive (but not always indicative) of raised ICP and continuous access to ICP levels may greatly facilitate their management.…”

The constant flow ventricular infusion test: a simple and useful study in the diagnosis of third ventriculostomy failure

“…33,42 A high percentage of B waves during ICP monitoring has been found in some studies to correlate with hydrocephalus, predicting improvement on VP shunt insertion in NPH or on revision of a potentially occluded VP shunt. 22,39 However, a study of preoperative ICP monitoring in a mixed cohort of hydrocephalic patients only identified a strong correlation between B waves and postoperative improvement when nocturnal monitor-ing was considered. 53 The authors postulated that increased CSF production at night reduces compensatory reserve.…”