Continuous Flow Perfused Cadaver Model for Endovascular Training, Research, and Development

Sarkar, Amrita; Kalsi, Richa; Ayers, Joseph D.; Drucker, Charles B.; Kaushal, Vaidehi; Sutton, William R.; Crawford, Robert S.

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.11.030

Cited by 20 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of the reports were descriptive only of the cadaveric model with no validation or assessment. Face validity was established in 41.7% (5 of 12) of the reports (Aboud et al, ; Carey et al, ; Chen et al, ; Karras et al, ; Nesbitt et al, , b), and construct validity was established in 25% (3 of 12) of the reports (Chen et al, ; McLeod et al, ; Sarkar et al, ). Most reports were based on cadaveric simulation models and/or cadaveric simulation studies that were conducted at academic medical centers, with the exception of one study that was performed at a community hospital (Sarkar et al, ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Face validity was established in 41.7% (5 of 12) of the reports (Aboud et al, ; Carey et al, ; Chen et al, ; Karras et al, ; Nesbitt et al, , b), and construct validity was established in 25% (3 of 12) of the reports (Chen et al, ; McLeod et al, ; Sarkar et al, ). Most reports were based on cadaveric simulation models and/or cadaveric simulation studies that were conducted at academic medical centers, with the exception of one study that was performed at a community hospital (Sarkar et al, ). Only 33.3% (4 of 12) of reports discussed the amount of time required to set‐up the simulation model (Aboud et al, ; Bouma et al, , ; Sarkar et al, ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Simulation with three-dimensional (3D) print models may prove to be a major advantage in congenital cardiac surgery simulation, where trainees are not likely to see all of the extensive variations in the anatomy of congenital heart disease during training ( While cadaveric simulation curriculums have most commonly been incorporated into training in the neurosurgical, general surgical, orthopedic surgical, and trauma surgical specialties, interest in cadaveric simulation for application in teaching basic core surgical skills, common operative procedures, and advanced skills and operative procedures in cardiothoracic surgery as an adjunct to traditional operative training is becoming more prominent (Fig. 2) (Aboud et al, 2011;Inboriboon and Lumlertgul, 2013;Sharma et al, 2013;Massey et al, 2014;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Carey et al, 2015;Greene et al, 2015;Mavroudis et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017;Karras et al, 2017;McLeod et al, 2017;Nesbitt et al, 2018a, b;Sarkar et al, 2018). Cadaveric models provide greater anatomical authenticity, which may be more advantageous for simulation of complex procedures that require greater anatomic accuracy for more advanced learners, full procedural simulations, anatomic dissection, and experience in less familiar surgical exposures (Kuhls et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most reports were based on cadaveric simulation models and/or cadaveric simulation studies that were conducted at academic medical centers, with the exception of one study that was performed at a community hospital (Sarkar et al, 2018). Only 33.3% (4 of 12) of reports discussed the amount of time required to set-up the simulation model (Aboud et al, 2011;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Sarkar et al, 2018). Similarly, cost analysis was performed in only 33.3% (4 of 12) of reports and was often incomplete (Aboud et al, 2011;Bouma et al, 2015;Sarkar et al, 2018).…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only 33.3% (4 of 12) of reports discussed the amount of time required to set-up the simulation model (Aboud et al, 2011;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Sarkar et al, 2018). Similarly, cost analysis was performed in only 33.3% (4 of 12) of reports and was often incomplete (Aboud et al, 2011;Bouma et al, 2015;Sarkar et al, 2018). Cost analysis was performed in three of the reports identified in this systematic review.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Cadaveric Simulation Training in Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Robinson

Piekut

Hasman

et al. 2019

Anatomical Sciences Ed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simulation training has become increasingly relevant in the educational curriculum of surgical trainees. The types of simulation models used, goals of simulation training, and an objective assessment of its utility and effectiveness are highly variable. The role and effectiveness of cadaveric simulation in cardiothoracic surgical training has not been well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the current medical literature available on the utility and the effectiveness of cadaveric simulation in cardiothoracic surgical residency training. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception to February 2019. Of the 362 citations obtained, 23 articles were identified and retrieved for full review, yielding ten eligible articles that were included for analysis. One additional study was identified and included in the analysis. Extraction of data from the selected articles was performed using predetermined data fields, including study design, study participants, simulation task, performance metrics, and costs. Most of these studies were only descriptive of a cadaveric or perfused cadaveric simulation model that could be used to augment clinical operative training in cardiothoracic surgery. There is a paucity of evidence in the literature that specifically evaluates the utility and the efficacy of cadavers in cardiothoracic surgery training. Of the few studies that have been published in the literature, cadaveric simulation does seem to have a role in cardiothoracic surgery training beyond simply learning basic skills. Additional research in this area is needed. Anat Sci Educ 13: 406-418.

show abstract