Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1996 1996
DOI: 10.1109/vnis.1996.1623758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous flow intersection: A public private partnership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, according to Mier (Goldblatt et al, 1994), the construction cost of a CFI may be two to three times the cost of a standard intersection design due to increased right-of-way costs, and the need for additional, coordinated signal controllers. However, they are significantly cheaper than elevated design interchanges with savings ranging from 5:1 to 10:1 (Berkowitz et al, 1996). Naghawi et al (2018) studied the implementation of the Superstreet unconventional intersection design at Tabarbour Intersection in Amman, Jordan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, according to Mier (Goldblatt et al, 1994), the construction cost of a CFI may be two to three times the cost of a standard intersection design due to increased right-of-way costs, and the need for additional, coordinated signal controllers. However, they are significantly cheaper than elevated design interchanges with savings ranging from 5:1 to 10:1 (Berkowitz et al, 1996). Naghawi et al (2018) studied the implementation of the Superstreet unconventional intersection design at Tabarbour Intersection in Amman, Jordan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the capacity and operational efficiency of intersections can be improved significantly. Although previous studies have indicated that the DLT design has the potential to improve the operation and safety of signalized intersections [1][2][3][4][5][6], its safety impact needs to be investigated further because rerouting vehicles that are going to make left turns at upstream locations could increase the risk of crashes at these locations. In addition, drivers' acceptance of the new design also needs to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Disregarding the left-turn signage, (2) Drivers making left turns failed to yield the right of way, and 3Drivers making dual left turns failed to keep their vehicles in a single lane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative intersection designs have been developed that allow left-turning vehicles in non-traditional ways. These strategies manage left-turn conflicts by using additional features (e.g., downstream U-turns or additional signals) and/or changing the intersection geometry ( 1622 ). However, these designs are generally not well-suited for urban areas with limited road space as they require large spatial footprints or long blocks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%