2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-flow aerobic granulation in plug-flow bioreactors fed with real domestic wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that the seed reactor overflow turbidity was only 0.77 ± 0.31 NTU, indicating excellent structural stability of these seed granules. The settling velocity of seed granules in ALR was as high as 54.2 m h −1 , which was comparable with those reported in previous studies, i.e., 18-60 m h −1 [14][15][16]. Table 2 shows that the nitrification efficiency was as high as 97%, indicating the excellent performance of these nitrifying granules.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Seed Granulessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be pointed out that the seed reactor overflow turbidity was only 0.77 ± 0.31 NTU, indicating excellent structural stability of these seed granules. The settling velocity of seed granules in ALR was as high as 54.2 m h −1 , which was comparable with those reported in previous studies, i.e., 18-60 m h −1 [14][15][16]. Table 2 shows that the nitrification efficiency was as high as 97%, indicating the excellent performance of these nitrifying granules.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Seed Granulessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Technically, this challenge cannot be resolved in completely stirred tank reactors, in which bulk substrate concentration is expected to be low. Instead, plug flow reactors, in which deeper mass diffusion can be facilitated by a relatively higher initial substrate concentration, should be considered in future GMBR research [16]. Besides this mass diffusion problem, special attention should also be paid to the high sEPS concentration accumulated in the GMBR [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of advanced biological nitrogen removal for mainstream wastewater treatment, efforts are merging from two research directions, that is, (a) employ anammox in mainstream to reduce 60% of energy and 100% of chemicals required in traditional biological nitrogen removal (Strous, Heijnen, Kuenen, & Jetten, 1998; Tomaszewski, Cema, & Ziembińska‐Buczyńska, 2017); and (b) employ aerobic granular sludge in mainstream for high‐rate bioreaction, bioprocess consolidation, and settleability enhancement (Kent, Bott, & Wang, 2018; Sun, Angelotti, & Wang, 2019). As a result, attempts have been made to immobilize critical microbial communities required for successful anammox in aerobic granules with the hope of future application in the continuous‐flow treatment trains of mainstream wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long‐term structural stability of aerobic granules in continuous‐flow mainstream application is another unknown. Although the slow‐growing nitrifying aerobic granules are noted for their outstanding structural stability (Liu, Yang, & Tay, 2004), almost all of the aerobic granules reported so far were cultivated in SBRs (He, Zhang, Zhang, & Wang, 2017; Wei et al, 2018), which is incompatible with the continuous‐flow nature of the mainstream wastewater treatment (Kent et al, 2018; Sun et al, 2019). Although some nitrifying granules have been studied in CFRs, the longest cultivation only lasted about 300–400 days (Bartrolí, Pérez, & Carrera, 2010; Isanta et al, 2015; Kent et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation