2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/5/1269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous depth-of-interaction measurement in a single-layer pixelated crystal array using a single-ended readout

Abstract: We propose a depth-of-interaction (DOI)-encoding method to extract continuous DOI information using a single-layer scintillation crystal array with single-ended readout for cost-effective high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET). DOI information is estimated by different light dispersions along the x- and y-directions tailored by the geometric shape of reflectors around the crystals. The detector module comprised a 22 × 22 array of unpolished LGSO crystals (2.0 × 2.0 × 20 mm(3)). A multi-anode photom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In long axial field-of-view PET scanners or preclinical systems with tight bore diameters, detectors that encode depth-of-interaction (DOI) have also been developed to correct parallax errors. These detectors often use customized designs with very specific crystal surface treatments (Ito et al , 2013; Yang et al , 2006; Roncali et al , 2014b) that are optimized with simulations (Ito et al , 2010). To perform those simulations, optical models have been implemented in the widely distributed opensource software Geant4 (Agostinelli et al , 2003; Pizzichemi et al , 2012) and GATE (Jan et al , 2004; Cuplov et al , 2014), based on previous work done in DETECT2000 (Levin and Moisan, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In long axial field-of-view PET scanners or preclinical systems with tight bore diameters, detectors that encode depth-of-interaction (DOI) have also been developed to correct parallax errors. These detectors often use customized designs with very specific crystal surface treatments (Ito et al , 2013; Yang et al , 2006; Roncali et al , 2014b) that are optimized with simulations (Ito et al , 2010). To perform those simulations, optical models have been implemented in the widely distributed opensource software Geant4 (Agostinelli et al , 2003; Pizzichemi et al , 2012) and GATE (Jan et al , 2004; Cuplov et al , 2014), based on previous work done in DETECT2000 (Levin and Moisan, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we choose the rectangular windows to validate the four‐crystals‐to‐one‐SiPM coupling technology, because they are simple and easy to fabricate with good precision. The four‐crystals‐to‐one‐SiPM coupling technology presented in this paper can be adapted in designs with different light‐sharing windows, including rectangular windows, triangular windows, and the combinations of windows with different shapes …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four-crystals-to-one-SiPM coupling technology presented in this paper can be adapted in designs with different light-sharing windows, including rectangular windows, triangular windows, and the combinations of windows with different shapes. [35][36][37][38][39][40] Generally, there are two major challenges in design and construct a high-performance DOI detector using the LSW method. The first one is to optimize the geometry and optical properties of the LSWs and reflectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many designs have an increased number of photosensors such as dual-ended readout (Kang, Ko, Rhee, Kim, Lee & Hong 2015), or multi-layered detectors (Yeom, Vinke & Levin 2014). Other methods do not use increased number of photodetectors such as using scintillation shape (rise or decay times) (Schmall, Surti & Karp 2015) (Roncali, Schmall, Viswanath, Berg & Cherry 2014) or light sharing (Van Dam, Borghi, Seifert & Schaart 2013) (Ito, Lee & Lee 2013) to give DOI information. However, many of these methods require active cooling or a significant increase in PET detector readout complexity to measure the light spread or scintillation shape accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%