Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Counter-Current Multistage Microextraction in a Novel Tube-In-Tube Microextractor

Abstract: Counter-current operation has been widely applied to enhance the extraction efficiency for systems with low distribution coefficients, which was hindered in microextraction because viscous force and surface tension dominate over gravity and inertial force. In this study, a novel design of a tube-in-tube microextractor relying on a poly tetra fluoroethylene membrane to construct a stable interface was proposed to conduct continuous counter-current extraction. Extraction kinetics for two systems with different d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytes partition between the sample solution and the flowing organic solvent, leading to their extraction and preconcentration. CFME carries various drawbacks that necessitate careful consideration [63]. The ongoing nature of the extraction process introduces the risk of contaminant carryover from one sample to the next, impacting the precision and reproducibility of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytes partition between the sample solution and the flowing organic solvent, leading to their extraction and preconcentration. CFME carries various drawbacks that necessitate careful consideration [63]. The ongoing nature of the extraction process introduces the risk of contaminant carryover from one sample to the next, impacting the precision and reproducibility of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%