Fetal neurobehavioral development was modeled longitudinally using data collected at weekly intervals from 24-to -38 weeks gestation in a sample of 112 healthy pregnancies. Predictive associations between 3 measures of fetal neurobehavioral functioning and their developmental trajectories to neurological maturation in the 1st weeks after birth were examined. Prenatal measures included fetal heart rate variability, fetal movement, and coupling between fetal motor activity and heart rate patterning; neonatal outcomes include a standard neurologic examination (n = 97) and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP; n = 47). Optimality in newborn motor activity and reflexes was predicted by fetal motor activity; fetal heart rate variability and somaticcardiac coupling predicted BAEP parameters. Maternal pregnancy-specific psychological stress was associated with accelerated neurologic maturation."If we pursue our quest beyond the newborn period, we find ourselves suddenly in an entirely new situation, where our organism is not seen, nor scarcely felt nor heard. Our environmental situation has become, if not at once more complex, at least to be likened to the postnatal environment only with great difficulty" (Sontag & Richards, 1938, p. 1).While the last decade has been marked by increasing appreciation of the role of the prenatal environment in providing the substrate for postnatal health and development, recognition of the continuous nature of human development from conception was evident in the earliest publications of the Fels Research Institute, established in 1929. Since that time, many of the core interests of developmental psychology concerning development and expression of individual differences and the moderating role of early environmental influences have begun to converge with epidemiologic methodology. The construct of "fetal programming" has been applied broadly to represent discoveries of prenatal influences on postnatal functioning, typically in adulthood (Barker, 2006;O'Brien, Wheeler, & Barker, 1999;Young, 2002). While this approach has generated an enormous body of data, thereby sparking great interest in the prenatal period, most studies rely on readily available data sources, such as birth weight, that provide only vague proxy for the gestational environment and can offer little information about mechanisms mediating observed associations.A second, more direct, approach is to measure function during the prenatal period to evaluate its role as the foundation for postnatal function. This permits measurement of a single construct and allows determination of how early experiences or exposures might affect the latter via their influence on the former. Technological advances available only after the dissolution of the Fels Institute have made clear that by the end of gestation developmental parameters that are measured extensively in the neonate and infant, and are integral to theories of development, originate at neither term nor with birth (Als, 1982; Prechtl, 1984). The view that fetal neurob...