2006
DOI: 10.1785/0120050822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Borehole Strain and Pore Pressure in the Near Field of the 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquake: Implications for Nucleation, Fault Response, Earthquake Prediction, and Tremor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[] attributed to preseismic dilation. This raises a fundamental question as to why changes of groundwater chemistry apparently coupled with preseismic dilation were seen at Hafralækur, 76 km from the epicenters of two M > 5 earthquakes, while geodetic measurements made along the San Andreas Fault, less than 10 km from the epicenter of the M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake revealed no evidence of preseismic change of dilational strain [ Johnston et al ., ]. This paradox could be resolved if both chemical changes in groundwater and the earthquakes could be related to magma movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] attributed to preseismic dilation. This raises a fundamental question as to why changes of groundwater chemistry apparently coupled with preseismic dilation were seen at Hafralækur, 76 km from the epicenters of two M > 5 earthquakes, while geodetic measurements made along the San Andreas Fault, less than 10 km from the epicenter of the M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake revealed no evidence of preseismic change of dilational strain [ Johnston et al ., ]. This paradox could be resolved if both chemical changes in groundwater and the earthquakes could be related to magma movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative time signatures we develop enable us to rigorously assess this observation through a statistical analysis of the spatial correlations of the LFE occurrence patterns. To this end, we use a hierarchical clustering algorithm (Kaufmen and Rousseeuw, 2005) to sort the sources into clusters based on the similarity of their cumulative time signatures (equation (1)). Sources within a given cluster therefore have occurrence patterns that are quantitatively similar in form.…”
Section: Clustering Of Nearby Lfe Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional‐scale (approximately kilometers) seismological studies have sometimes identified slow, possibly premonitory, phenomena embedded in the main shock seismograms [ Iio , ; Ellsworth and Beroza , ; Beroza and Ellsworth , ]. However, these motions are difficult to detect [e.g., Tullis , ; Johnston et al , ], and whether they are intrinsic to an earthquake is yet unproven [ Olson and Allen , ]. In certain cases, clusters and swarms of small earthquakes and/or foreshocks have been detected weeks to minutes before the eventual main shock [e.g., Mogi , ; Ohnaka , ; Nadeau et al , ; Dodge et al , , ; Ando and Imanishi , ; Bouchon et al , ; Chiaraluce et al , ; Chen and Shearer , ; Govoni et al , ; Tape et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%