2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous and event-based time series analysis of observed floodplain groundwater flow under contrasting land-use types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this result is that larger events produced high streamflows sufficient to reverse baseflow direction (e.g., event‐based stream to aquifer flows). Given greater aquifer‐stream connectivity at the BHF, relative to the Ag site, reported in previous studies (Kellner, Hubbart, & Ikem, ; Kellner & Hubbart, ), quicker water table responses to high flows would be expected at the BHF. Recent work conducted at the sites (Kellner & Hubbart, ) presented results supporting this hypothesis, specifically showing higher magnitude stream to aquifer groundwater flows at the BHF during high streamflows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation for this result is that larger events produced high streamflows sufficient to reverse baseflow direction (e.g., event‐based stream to aquifer flows). Given greater aquifer‐stream connectivity at the BHF, relative to the Ag site, reported in previous studies (Kellner, Hubbart, & Ikem, ; Kellner & Hubbart, ), quicker water table responses to high flows would be expected at the BHF. Recent work conducted at the sites (Kellner & Hubbart, ) presented results supporting this hypothesis, specifically showing higher magnitude stream to aquifer groundwater flows at the BHF during high streamflows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Given greater aquifer‐stream connectivity at the BHF, relative to the Ag site, reported in previous studies (Kellner, Hubbart, & Ikem, ; Kellner & Hubbart, ), quicker water table responses to high flows would be expected at the BHF. Recent work conducted at the sites (Kellner & Hubbart, ) presented results supporting this hypothesis, specifically showing higher magnitude stream to aquifer groundwater flows at the BHF during high streamflows. Quicker water table response to high‐flow events at the BHF, relative to the Ag site, further illustrates the greater flood attenuation capacity of the BHF floodplain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…where r is the radius of the well casing (cm), R is the radius of the well screen (cm), L e is the length of the well screen (cm), and t 37 (s) is the time it takes for the water level inside the piezometer to rise or fall 37% of the initial change during a slug test. It should be noted that the average K sat derived from slug tests requires the assumption that the average K sat is representative of the actual field conditions [23].…”
Section: Field Saturated Hydraulic Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, field-based K sat estimates can be limited by incomplete aquifer geometry information, while laboratory methods can present problems with obtaining representative sample numbers. These challenges suggest the need for methods to estimate K sat that are accurate and efficient [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such alterations impact water quality (e.g., chemical composition, pathogen presence and persistence) and quantity regimes (e.g., low flows, peak flows, flooding) [5][6][7][8], and can ultimately result in ecosystem degradation. However, water quality and quantity regimes are variably impacted by natural and anthropogenic factors, and are consequently difficult to quantify and manage in contemporary watersheds [6,9], where a mosaic of land use types confounds attributing causative mechanisms to observed alterations of hydrologic regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%