2000
DOI: 10.1006/jath.1999.3399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Algorithms in n-Term Approximation and Non-Linear Widths

Abstract: In the present paper we investigate optimal continuous algorithms in n-term approximation based on various non-linear n-widths, and n-term approximation by the dictionary V formed from the integer translates of the mixed dyadic scales of the tensor product multivariate de la Valle e Poussin kernel, for the unit ball of Sobolev and Besov spaces of functions with common mixed smoothness. The asymptotic orders of these quantities are given. For each space the asymptotic orders of nonlinear n-widths and n-term app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of this assertion is similar to the proof of Lemma 4 in [4]. We can also use the method in the proof of Theorem 2.2 from [15] to prove the lower estimate = n (SB r p, % , L 1 )> >n &r (log n) (d&1)(r+1Â2&1Â%) , which immediately yields the lower bound of = n (SB r p, % , L q ) and = n (SW r p , L q ).…”
Section: Lower Bound For Non-linear Widthsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The proof of this assertion is similar to the proof of Lemma 4 in [4]. We can also use the method in the proof of Theorem 2.2 from [15] to prove the lower estimate = n (SB r p, % , L 1 )> >n &r (log n) (d&1)(r+1Â2&1Â%) , which immediately yields the lower bound of = n (SB r p, % , L q ) and = n (SW r p , L q ).…”
Section: Lower Bound For Non-linear Widthsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…If is a family of elements in X such that σ n (W, , X) > 0, we have [12] σ n+m (W, , Y) ≤ σ n (W, , X)σ m (SX, , Y).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(ii) Under certain additional restrictions, the periodic counterpart of (2.2) has been proved by Dinh Dũng [20][21][22]. He applied a similar discretization argument to reformulate the approximation problem as one for sequence spaces.…”
Section: Remark 24mentioning
confidence: 95%