Continuity of Motion in Whitehead’s Geometrical Space

Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility

“…21 It is interesting to note that in 1967 Agazzi devised a thought experiment in some way similar to Searle's. 23 Agazzi too argues against the Turing Test by pointing out that it is intrinsically impossible to determine intentionality through behaviour. 23 Agazzi too argues against the Turing Test by pointing out that it is intrinsically impossible to determine intentionality through behaviour.…”

“…23 In more intuitive but rough terms, one theory is deeper than another if the former answers more why questions, about a given area of investigation, than the latter. S 2 ⊂ S 1 and ~(G 1 ⊂ G 2 ); ii.…”

“…21 The distinction between progress in depth and progress in breadth has been proposed by Zwart (2001: 2). 23 This condition is important to avoid the meaningless cases caused by the irrelevant addition of S and G. Indeed, it would be easy to build an artificial example of a theory deeper than a given theory X by adding to the latter observational and/or theoretical terms irrelevant for O 12 . On the contrary, though Gs are calculated on the basis of Fs, the latter do not determine which are the former.…”