2013
DOI: 10.5114/reum.2013.33394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity of monitoring the rheumatic diseases course in patients after 18 years of age – the point of view of internist

Abstract: Reumatologia 2013; 51/1 S t r e s z c z e n i eMłodzież w okresie dojrzewania i młodzi dorośli mogą chorować na postępujące, aktywne zapalne choroby reumatyczne, w szczególności na młodzieńcze idiopatyczne zapalenie stawów. Wymagają oni kontynuacji leczenia i przeniesienia spod opieki pediatrów pod opiekę lekarzy zajmujących się osobami dorosłymi. Proces "przeniesienia" powinien polegać na współpracy między tymi lekarzami, a także na samodzielnym udziale chorego, który znalazł się w nowej sytuacji. Niezwykle w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical effect of the treatment was assessed based on the difference between DAS28 and VAS values seen prior to treatment and after 6 months of treatment with LEF and MTX s.c. The 6-month follow-up period is, in many authors' opinion, sufficient to enable an assessment of the therapeutic effect of both medications [9,10]. There were no differences in age or disease duration between patients who did not achieve clinical improvement, as defined by EULAR guidelines, and patients who did respond to treatment.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical effect of the treatment was assessed based on the difference between DAS28 and VAS values seen prior to treatment and after 6 months of treatment with LEF and MTX s.c. The 6-month follow-up period is, in many authors' opinion, sufficient to enable an assessment of the therapeutic effect of both medications [9,10]. There were no differences in age or disease duration between patients who did not achieve clinical improvement, as defined by EULAR guidelines, and patients who did respond to treatment.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%