2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity of care in youth services: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Services may build on positive outcomes for youth by employing supported referrals and incorporating accountability for transition outcomes within their service model. (Naert, Roose, Rapp, & Vanderplasschen, 2017).…”
Section: Referral Facilitatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Services may build on positive outcomes for youth by employing supported referrals and incorporating accountability for transition outcomes within their service model. (Naert, Roose, Rapp, & Vanderplasschen, 2017).…”
Section: Referral Facilitatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, increased number of mental health visits per patient at FQHCs corresponds with African American youth's reduced odds of outpatient psychiatric ED visits. Most youth presenting with a mental disorder require routine follow‐up and coordination between primary care providers and specialists . Number of mental health visits per patient seen in this setting may therefore gauge the quality and/or continuity of mental health care at FQHCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of mental health visits per patient seen in this setting may therefore gauge the quality and/or continuity of mental health care at FQHCs. Whereas the field does not agree on a single definition of continuity of care, we aim to cross‐validate this “intensity” measure with other FQHC‐reported indicators of quality, continuity, and care coordination of mental health services. These variables become available for FQHCs beginning in 2014 and merit further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strolin-Goltzman, Kollar, and Trinkle (2010) viewed this harmful to the children's capacity for attachment, making them hesitant to trust and engage with staff. Although there is a lack of research on continuity of youth care services (Naert, Roose, Rapp, & Vanderplasschen, 2017), there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that placement stability improves the outcomes of care leavers (Dixon & Stein, 2005;Holland, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%