2013
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity, Coordination, and Transitions of Care for Patients with Serious and Advanced Illness: A Systematic Review of Interventions

Abstract: Many studies were limited by methodologic issues such as use of measurement tools not developed for patients with advanced disease and small sample size. Interventions and outcomes were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. We found moderate evidence that interventions targeting continuity, coordination, and transitions in patients with advanced and serious illness improve patient and caregiver satisfaction, but low evidence for other outcomes. Further research is needed on how to target these domains for outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the frailty of the population, this was probably not sufficient. Many transitional interventions have longer periods of follow-up and have demonstrated longer-term success in changing health status and health utilization behaviours of the population they serve [44,45]. Naylor et al [46] suggests that although transition interventions are successful in improving the patient's self-management capacity, there is a need for on-going follow-up in the post-discharge period given the on-going progressive nature of the chronic conditions of patients and in the case of this particular study, increasing levels of frailty.…”
Section: Intervention Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the frailty of the population, this was probably not sufficient. Many transitional interventions have longer periods of follow-up and have demonstrated longer-term success in changing health status and health utilization behaviours of the population they serve [44,45]. Naylor et al [46] suggests that although transition interventions are successful in improving the patient's self-management capacity, there is a need for on-going follow-up in the post-discharge period given the on-going progressive nature of the chronic conditions of patients and in the case of this particular study, increasing levels of frailty.…”
Section: Intervention Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 A systematic review of interventions in the literature evaluated continuity, coordination, and transitions of care as key components of PC care. 13 Within these domains, they searched for improvement in patient and caregiver quality of life, satisfaction, and health care utilization outcomes for those with advanced or serious illness. The specific interventions or metrics were too heterogeneous for a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement in utilization was low. 13 Investigators in the first benchmarking study to look at quality PC in the United States compared the delivery of PC and key essential elements of PC in 35 hospitals across academic settings. 14 This retrospective chart review included persons who received and did not receive a PC consult.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]. COC for patients with serious illnesses has long been regarded as important, with attention paid to many facets of continuity, including both personal or relational continuity as well as informational/knowledge continuity [6,7]. Studies from family practice as well as home-based palliative care indicate the importance of COC for patients [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%