Continuing education in pain management: using a competency framework to guide professional development

Devonshire, Elizabeth; Nicholas, Michael K.

doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000688

Cited by 20 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 53 publications

(63 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Education and training opportunities are urgently needed to address this, but health systems will also need to accommodate these new approaches if they are to flourish. 2,16,30,110…”

Section: Summary and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

The biopsychosocial model of pain 40 years on: time for a reappraisal?

Nicholas

2022

Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Education and training opportunities are urgently needed to address this, but health systems will also need to accommodate these new approaches if they are to flourish. 2,16,30,110…”

Section: Summary and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

The biopsychosocial model of pain 40 years on: time for a reappraisal?

Nicholas

2022

Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The findings from this study are transferrable to the growing literature on the development of pain education frameworks in various disciplines such as medicine, nursing, and dentistry. [30][31][32] Similarly, Mustafa et al 29 explored the lived experience of chronic pain in immigrant Indian-Canadian women using a phenomenological design. The authors found that immigrant Indian-Canadian women's experiences of pain are influenced by several unique sociocultural factors (e.g., gender roles, work burden, lack of social support), which in turn impact pain expression, openness to treatment, and the consequences of pain on the family.…”

Section: Current Controversiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualitative research and pain: Current controversies and future directions

Tutelman

Webster

2020

Canadian Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much of what we know about the meaning and experience of pain has been facilitated through qualitative research. However, qualitative inquiry continues to be underrepresented in the pain literature relative to quantitative approaches. In this Commentary and Introduction to the Special Issue on Qualitative Research and Pain, we present a collection of high-quality, cutting-edge qualitative studies in pain that highlight theoretical and methodological advancements in the field. The articles included in this Special Issue feature a range of designs (e.g., grounded theory, phenomenology, qualitative description), methods of data collection (e.g., interviews, object elicitation, photovoice), and populations (e.g., immigrant women, individuals with heart disease). Throughout this Commentary we also address three common controversies regarding the quality of qualitative research and the stance we took on them for the Issue. These primarily deal with the procedure-related issues of sample size, generalizability, and saturation. We discuss how a more substantive-centered approach to evaluation-that is, an approach that considers the methodological and theoretical significance of the work-is crucial for advancing qualitative research in pain. RÉSUMÉ Une grande partie de ce que nous savons sur la signification et l'expérience de la douleur a été facilitée par la recherche qualitative. Cependant, l'enquête qualitative continue d'être sousreprésentée dans la littérature sur la douleur en ce qui concerne les approches quantitatives. Dans ce commentaire et introduction au numéro spécial sur la recherche qualitative et la douleur, nous présentons un recueil de haute qualité d'études qualitatives de pointe sur la douleur qui mettent en évidence les avancées théoriques et méthodologiques dans le domaine. Les articles inclus dans ce numéro spécial présentent une gamme de conceptions (p. ex., la théorie ancrée, la phénoménologie, la description qualitative), de méthodes de collecte de données (p. ex., les entretiens, l'élicitation d'objets, le photovoice) et de populations (par exemple, les femmes immigrantes, les personnes atteintes de maladie cardiaque). Tout au long de ce commentaire, nous abordons également trois controverses courantes concernant la qualité de la recherche qualitative et la position que nous avons adoptée à leur égard pour ce numéro. Celles-ci traitent principalement de problèmes liés à la procédure, notamment la taille de l'échantillon, la généralisabilité et la saturation. Nous discutons de la façon dont une approche de l'évaluation davantage centrée sur le fond-c'est-à-dire une approche qui tient compte de la signification théorique et méthodologique des travaux-est primordiale pour faire avancer la recherche qualitative sur la douleur.

show abstract

“…This systematised approach will enable critical foundation-level care priorities to be extended across more advanced training programs, thereby strengthening training consistency and coherence. Where training gaps are identified, new content will be derived to target care priorities by reinforcing and extending practical capabilities using established educational methodologies, 30 , 33 with flexibility to adapt for discipline-specific training or population-specific training (eg, paediatric pain care).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The NSAP is timely because a nationally consistent approach to pain training of emerging and current health workforces remains a challenge in Australia. 3,12,18 While interdisciplinary pain training programs are currently conducted in Australia, 30 challenges to implementing and scaling programs include difficult to sustain expensive face-to-face training models, 68 insufficient skilled workforce to deliver training, limited opportunities to receive training, 17 and geographic barriers to accessing training. 68 Such factors rate-limit the reach, scalability, impact, and sustainability of training initiatives with potential downstream barriers to delivering effective clinical care.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%