Abstract:Health care continuing education (CE) professionals and health sciences librarians have many common goals including ( I ) identibing information seeking behaviors of health professionals, ( 2 ) providing the information that hasDirectly or indirectly, health sciences librarians and continuing education (CE) professionals have long been working toward the same goal: ensuring that health professionals have the information and knowledge they need to deliver quality health care. Historically, CE and libraries coul… Show more
“…In terms of session type, most included sources reported on librarians delivering a structured class or workshop session (n=90, 86%), but several unique examples described librarians developing and leading games [ 38 ], writing and presenting theatrical plays [ 39 ], and holding instructional exhibits [ 40 , 41 ]. The setting and formats of librarian teaching was fluid, as some sources described librarians visiting clinical teaching units to reach their audience [ 11 , 42 – 49 ], Some sources reported multiple session types and were coded as such.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, authors of 59 included sources (56%) provided recommendations for future planning and teaching. Some suggested adding motivation to participate through formal accreditation: “CME credit also helped establish the relevance of information management to clinical practice” [ 37 ]; the value in leveraging partnerships: “Establishing a collaborative relationship with nurses and other health professionals will boost the visibility of librarians and the stature and professional impact in EB processes” [ 43 ]; and realizing the continuing education potential of existing resources: “Many health sciences libraries already have educational programs in place on various topics...CE professionals can tap into this existing pool of courses and request that they be tailored to fit specific audiences at CE conferences or exhibits” [ 40 ]. For the full list of captured suggestions, see Online Supplement Appendix 3 Table 5 .…”
Objective: Health professionals have an ongoing need for continuing education (CE). Health Science Librarians (HSLs) are accustomed to support the learning needs of others in a variety of contexts and are well situated to provide CE. To better understand the current extent of these activities, we undertook a scoping review to determine how HSLs instruct practicing clinicians and health sciences faculty in support of their CE.
Methods: We searched for published and unpublished literature. Sources included PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Elsevier); Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Full Text (EBSCO); Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (EBSCO); and Library Literature and Information Science Full Text (EBSCO). To identify unpublished sources, we searched Google and contacted two health sciences library listservs.
Results: The included sources were published between 1970 to 2021 and covered a range of topics. Those related to evidence based practice (EBP) appeared around 2001 and bibliometrics and bioinformatics arose after 2016. HSLs teaching CE most commonly occurred in academic settings. The most common population taught was nurses, followed by physicians. Most sources did not report using an information literacy framework or instructional design model, undertaking needs assessments, or reporting formal objectives or assessment.
Conclusion: While HSLs are active supporters of EBP, we need to apply the same principles to our own professional practice. Formal structure of programming and program assessment combined with clear, detailed reporting can help to build a more robust evidence base to support future CE provision.
“…In terms of session type, most included sources reported on librarians delivering a structured class or workshop session (n=90, 86%), but several unique examples described librarians developing and leading games [ 38 ], writing and presenting theatrical plays [ 39 ], and holding instructional exhibits [ 40 , 41 ]. The setting and formats of librarian teaching was fluid, as some sources described librarians visiting clinical teaching units to reach their audience [ 11 , 42 – 49 ], Some sources reported multiple session types and were coded as such.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, authors of 59 included sources (56%) provided recommendations for future planning and teaching. Some suggested adding motivation to participate through formal accreditation: “CME credit also helped establish the relevance of information management to clinical practice” [ 37 ]; the value in leveraging partnerships: “Establishing a collaborative relationship with nurses and other health professionals will boost the visibility of librarians and the stature and professional impact in EB processes” [ 43 ]; and realizing the continuing education potential of existing resources: “Many health sciences libraries already have educational programs in place on various topics...CE professionals can tap into this existing pool of courses and request that they be tailored to fit specific audiences at CE conferences or exhibits” [ 40 ]. For the full list of captured suggestions, see Online Supplement Appendix 3 Table 5 .…”
Objective: Health professionals have an ongoing need for continuing education (CE). Health Science Librarians (HSLs) are accustomed to support the learning needs of others in a variety of contexts and are well situated to provide CE. To better understand the current extent of these activities, we undertook a scoping review to determine how HSLs instruct practicing clinicians and health sciences faculty in support of their CE.
Methods: We searched for published and unpublished literature. Sources included PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Elsevier); Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Full Text (EBSCO); Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (EBSCO); and Library Literature and Information Science Full Text (EBSCO). To identify unpublished sources, we searched Google and contacted two health sciences library listservs.
Results: The included sources were published between 1970 to 2021 and covered a range of topics. Those related to evidence based practice (EBP) appeared around 2001 and bibliometrics and bioinformatics arose after 2016. HSLs teaching CE most commonly occurred in academic settings. The most common population taught was nurses, followed by physicians. Most sources did not report using an information literacy framework or instructional design model, undertaking needs assessments, or reporting formal objectives or assessment.
Conclusion: While HSLs are active supporters of EBP, we need to apply the same principles to our own professional practice. Formal structure of programming and program assessment combined with clear, detailed reporting can help to build a more robust evidence base to support future CE provision.
“…4 This increasing emphasis on proactivity was echoed in McGowan's call for librarians to take a more active role in lifelong learning, 5 while collaboration was again discussed by Arnold and Humphries, who challenged librarians and CE educators to carry out ''research studies on information needs of health professionals to target specific areas for CE.'' 6 In 1977, Wender and colleagues at the University of Oklahoma conducted a major study to determine in part if there was a relationship between search request topics and areas of need for continuing medical education. 7,8 They concluded that, ''One may also consider the information requests the physician has made to his medical librarians to aid in determining his CME interests.''…”
Health sciences librarians are being called upon to be more proactive in their institutions' continuing education efforts. In an effort to identify whether search requests indicated CE needs, a study was conducted by a group of members of GaIN (Georgia Interactive Network for Medical Information). MEDLINE requests from health care professionals for subject specific clinical topics were collected during a six-month period via a standard search request form created for the study. Copies of all completed requests were collected and broad ICD-9 codes assigned to the search topics. Institutional reports were generated for each participating library to share with hospital CE coordinators. They were also compiled for the group as a whole, and reflected the "hottest" topics requested during the study period for physicians and for non-physicians (nurses, allied health, administrators). A survey to hospital librarians and CE educators showed some value in the reports, but greater potential for further collaboration between librarians and CE coordinators.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.