2011
DOI: 10.19030/jber.v7i6.2302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuing Case Against Inter-Period Tax Allocation

Abstract: <p class="MsoBlockText" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The annual and industry-based behavior of deferred tax balances is analyzed and the accounting theory and procedures required by the FASB are examined in the context of the unit problem. The unit problem involves the selection of the appropriate perspective (either individual or aggregate) for applying measurement a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second (2001–2010) and third decades (2011–2019), further research was triggered by high-profile accounting scandals like Enron, WorldCom, or Xerox, as well as the economic crisis of 2008 and various regulatory changes. Furthermore, researchers were motivated by the ongoing debate among preparers, regulators, standard-setters, and financial statement users as to whether any benefit in deferred tax accounting could justify the relatively high accounting costs (Beechy 2007 ; Colley et al 2009 ; Bauman and Shaw 2016 ; Brouwer and Naarding 2018 ). These triggers motivated both earnings management studies and value relevance studies.…”
Section: Bibliographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second (2001–2010) and third decades (2011–2019), further research was triggered by high-profile accounting scandals like Enron, WorldCom, or Xerox, as well as the economic crisis of 2008 and various regulatory changes. Furthermore, researchers were motivated by the ongoing debate among preparers, regulators, standard-setters, and financial statement users as to whether any benefit in deferred tax accounting could justify the relatively high accounting costs (Beechy 2007 ; Colley et al 2009 ; Bauman and Shaw 2016 ; Brouwer and Naarding 2018 ). These triggers motivated both earnings management studies and value relevance studies.…”
Section: Bibliographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information on deferred taxes is among the most objectively specialized (Colley et al, 2009) and costly accounting entries. In many tax regimes, Book income (or loss) differs from tax income.…”
Section: Taxes and Deferred Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most complex issues in the preparation of financial statements appears to be that of Deferred Taxes (Eierle & Haller, 2010;Colley et al, 2009). Deferred Tax Assets (DTA) and Liabilities (DTL) on balance sheets incorporate the estimated future tax effects of income taxes arising from temporary differences between Book and Taxable Income (Book-Tax Differences-BTDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%