1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb03813.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continued successful operation of open‐fronted microbiological safety cabinets in a force‐ventilated laboratory

Abstract: The considerable refinements necessary to enable Class I and II microbiological safety cabinets to operate in a force-ventilated laboratory and to meet appropriate safety criteria have been reported previously. The continued successful operation of such cabinets without a deterioration of operator protection is described. The performance of two Class II units, one meeting and one failing the current British Standard applied to four head KI-discus testing, is compared and discussed. In addition, some further po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper extends previous reports and concerns ( Clark et al . 1990 ; Osborne & Durkin 1991) and outlines the application of OPTs over a number of years within the routine servicing of OFMSCs employed in a force‐ventilated containment level 3 laboratory. It illustrates a need for continuous monitoring to ensure that cabinets regularly return the desired level of Operator Protection (OP) and compares the performance of class I and II units in standard, and to a limited extent, ‘in‐use’ tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper extends previous reports and concerns ( Clark et al . 1990 ; Osborne & Durkin 1991) and outlines the application of OPTs over a number of years within the routine servicing of OFMSCs employed in a force‐ventilated containment level 3 laboratory. It illustrates a need for continuous monitoring to ensure that cabinets regularly return the desired level of Operator Protection (OP) and compares the performance of class I and II units in standard, and to a limited extent, ‘in‐use’ tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%