“…For example, the cyclic method known in India in the 12th century, and the slightly less efficient but more regular English method 17th century, produce all solutions of x 2 − dy 2 = 1 (see [4]). But the most efficient method for finding the fundamental solution is based on the simple finite continued fraction expansion of √ d (see [2,5,6,[10][11][12][13] 1 , p n = a n p n−1 + p n−2 and q n = a n q n−1 + q n−2 for n ≥ 2. If r is odd, then the fundamental solution is (x 1 , y 1 ) = (p r , q r ), where p r /q r is the rth convergent of √ d and if r is even, then the fundamental solution is (…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be proved as in same way that the previous assertion was proved. , (5,6), (6,5), (6,6), (8,1), (8,10), (10, 0) , (2,11), (6,5), (6,8), (7,5), (7,8), (11,2), (11,11), (12, 0) ,…”