Continued Emissions of the Ozone‐Depleting Substance Carbon Tetrachloride From Eastern Asia

Abstract

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 ) is an ozone-depleting substance, accounting for about 10% of the chlorine in the troposphere. Under the terms of the Montreal Protocol, its production for dispersive uses was banned from 2010. In this work we show that, despite the controls on production being introduced, CCl 4 emissions from the eastern part of China did not decline between 2009 and 2016. This finding is in contrast to a recent bottom-up estimate, which predicted a significant decrease in emissions after the introduction of production controls. We find eastern Asian emissions of CCl 4 to be 16 (9-24) Gg/year on average between 2009 and 2016, with the primary source regions being in eastern China. The spatial distribution of emissions that we derive suggests that the source distribution of CCl 4 in China changed during the 8-year study period, indicating a new source or sources of emissions from China's Shandong province after 2012. Plain Language Summary Carbon tetrachloride is one of several man-made gases that contributeto the depletion of the ozone layer high in the atmosphere. Because of this, restrictions were introduced on the use of this ozone-depleting substance, with the expectation that production should by now be close to 0. However, the slower than expected rate of decline of carbon tetrachloride in the atmosphere shows this is not the case, and a large portion of global emissions are unaccounted for. In this study we use atmospheric measurements of carbon tetrachloride from a site in East Asia to identify the magnitude and location of emissions from this region between 2009 and 2016. We find that there are significant ongoing emissions from eastern China and that these account for a large part of the missing emissions from global estimates. The presence of continued sources of this important ozone-depleting substance indicates that more could be done to speed up the recovery of the ozone layer.

Emissions of halocarbons from India inferred through atmospheric measurements

“…However, India does not report the production of either HCFC-141b or HCFC-142b (Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, 2017). Landfills are another possible source of MCF, with previous studies from other regions reporting emissions from municipal waste disposal facilities (Maione et al, 2014;Talaiekhozani et al, 2018). Therefore, the nature, location and magnitude of the sources of MCF are uncertain, and we do not estimate a total for the whole of India.…”

“…At 0.07 (0.04-0.10) Gg yr −1 , MCF emissions from NCI account for 4.1 (2.4-5.9) % of global emissions. Despite its status as a developing country, which meant India had more time to phase out consumption of MCF compared to developed countries, emissions from NCI (which comprises 72 % of India's population and includes several key industrial regions) are smaller than those from Europe, which were estimated to be 0.20 Gg yr −1 in 2012 (Maione et al, 2014). Given the continued role of MCF in estimating global hydroxyl concentrations (e.g.…”

Review of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) based heating and cooling technologies: Past, present, and future outlook

“…Lunt et al claimed that amount around half of the global Freon-10 emissions is from east China during 2009 to 2016. 49 Hence, despite the phase-out of Freon-10 production in 2010, no evidence of a decrease in its emission found. They also investigated some other areas where the emission ozonedepleting gases are still present.…”

“…In recent years, eastern Asia is considered for the emission of Freon‐10. Lunt et al claimed that amount around half of the global Freon‐10 emissions is from east China during 2009 to 2016 . Hence, despite the phase‐out of Freon‐10 production in 2010, no evidence of a decrease in its emission found.…”

Atmospheric observations and emission estimates of ozone-depleting chlorocarbons from India

“…Originally used as a cleaning agent, the production of CTC for dispersive applications was banned globally in 2010. While 'bottom-up' emissions of CTC, estimated from reported consumption for feedstock use, are small (1 -4 Gg yr −1 (Montzka et al, 2011)), top-down studies, based on atmospheric observations, suggest actual global emissions still exceed 30 Gg yr −1 (Lunt et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2014;Chipperfield et al, 2016). In a recent bottom-up study, Sherry et al (2018) estimated that much of these additional emissions occur during the production of chloromethanes and perchloroethene and in chlor-alkali facilities.…”