2012
DOI: 10.1159/000342685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuation of Smoking after Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: An Independent Prognostic Factor?

Abstract: Aim: The aim of the study is to examine if continuation of smoking after treatment is an independent factor affecting the prognosis of laryngeal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 153 patients met the inclusion criteria for this prospective study, and they were followed up for 12–60 months. Smoking cessation/continuation rates were recorded and associated with disease recurrence and overall patient survival. Results: The recurrence rate was 35.29%. Twenty-five percent of the patients continued smoking a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies were conducted in the United States (60.3%, n =79; e.g., (74, 99, 101, 114, 134)), with the next most common study locations being in Canada (7.6%, n =10; (30, 38, 39, 44, 65, 84, 97, 104, 147, 148)) and France (4.6%, n =6; (32, 37, 100, 108, 113, 146)). Most papers described cross-sectional studies (75.6%, n =99), but some described longitudinal studies (24.4%, n =32) (10, 35, 38, 42, 45, 46, 52-54, 56, 62, 65, 69, 73, 75, 76, 80, 84, 89, 90, 98, 100, 103, 104, 118, 121, 123, 126, 129, 135, 149, 152). For the longitudinal studies, the number of tobacco use assessments ranged from two (e.g., (42, 100, 123)) to ≥ 5 (e.g., (69, 103, 121)); the number of assessments was sometimes unclear (e.g., (35, 118, 152)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies were conducted in the United States (60.3%, n =79; e.g., (74, 99, 101, 114, 134)), with the next most common study locations being in Canada (7.6%, n =10; (30, 38, 39, 44, 65, 84, 97, 104, 147, 148)) and France (4.6%, n =6; (32, 37, 100, 108, 113, 146)). Most papers described cross-sectional studies (75.6%, n =99), but some described longitudinal studies (24.4%, n =32) (10, 35, 38, 42, 45, 46, 52-54, 56, 62, 65, 69, 73, 75, 76, 80, 84, 89, 90, 98, 100, 103, 104, 118, 121, 123, 126, 129, 135, 149, 152). For the longitudinal studies, the number of tobacco use assessments ranged from two (e.g., (42, 100, 123)) to ≥ 5 (e.g., (69, 103, 121)); the number of assessments was sometimes unclear (e.g., (35, 118, 152)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, half ( n =16) of these papers reported data such that participants were either continuing smokers or not (35, 38, 45, 46, 56, 69, 75, 89, 90, 98, 100, 103, 118, 123, 126, 152). For this sub-group of longitudinal studies, the prevalence of smoking after lung or head/neck cancer diagnosis ranged from 8.2% (126) to 60.0% (75), with a mean of 30.5% ( SD =15.0; median=26.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations