2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuation of probability density functions using a generalized Lyapunov approach

Abstract: Techniques from numerical bifurcation theory are very useful to study transitions between steady fluid flow patterns and the instabilities involved. Here, we provide computational methodology to use parameter continuation in determining probability density functions of systems of stochastic partial differential equations near fixed points, under a small noise approximation. Key innovation is the efficient solution of a generalized Lyapunov equation using an iterative method involving low-rank approximations. W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gaussian probability density function at the fixed point can then be computed directly from C. When M is singular, special methods have been devised to cope with the singular part (Baars et al, 2017); also in this case, a generalized Lyapunov equation determines the covariance matrix C. Efficient solution methods for high-dimensional versions of Eq. 8are presented in Baars et al (2017).…”
Section: Continuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian probability density function at the fixed point can then be computed directly from C. When M is singular, special methods have been devised to cope with the singular part (Baars et al, 2017); also in this case, a generalized Lyapunov equation determines the covariance matrix C. Efficient solution methods for high-dimensional versions of Eq. 8are presented in Baars et al (2017).…”
Section: Continuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian probability density function at the fixed point can then be computed directly from C. When M is singular, special methods have been devised to cope with the singular part (Baars et al, 2017); also in this case, a generalized Lyapunov equation determines the covariance matrix C. Efficient solution methods for high-dimensional versions of (8) are presented in Baars et al (2017).…”
Section: Continuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a spatially two-dimensional ocean-only model, the covariance matrices C were determined from solving a Lyapunov equation 8in Baars et al (2017) for the case of noise in the freshwater forcing. While here it served only to test the new Lyapunov equation solver (RAILS), the methodology was extended recently to compute (noise-induced) transition probabilities of the AMOC and to relate that probability to the stability indicator Σ (Castellana et al, 2019).…”
Section: Tipping Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give further motivation to the suggested subspace in (5.1), we draw parallels with the (standard) rational Krylov subspace for the standard Lyapunov equation. The reasoning in this section can be compared to [4,Section 2]. We consider the equation…”
Section: Analogies To the Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%