The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.c035054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuation Multilevel Monte Carlo Evolutionary Algorithm for Robust Aerodynamic Shape Design

Abstract: The majority of problems in aircraft production and operation require decisions made in the presence of uncertainty. For this reason aerodynamic designs obtained with traditional deterministic optimization techniques seeking only optimality in a specific set of conditions may have very poor off-design performances or may even be unreliable. In this work, we present a novel approach for robust and reliability-based design optimization of aerodynamic shapes based on the combination of single and multi-objective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For small errors in the sample estimate of and (exact values indicated by ×) are acceptable but optimal variance reduction cannot be achieved 1 . Pisaroni 27 suggests a least-square fitting procedure to obtain the model constants but uses the cost model of Giles 18 . For the multilevel variance estimate we used the approach of Geraci 28 where the number of pilot samples chosen across levels equals the samples chosen across model fidelities.…”
Section: Insights On Model Correlation and Optimal Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For small errors in the sample estimate of and (exact values indicated by ×) are acceptable but optimal variance reduction cannot be achieved 1 . Pisaroni 27 suggests a least-square fitting procedure to obtain the model constants but uses the cost model of Giles 18 . For the multilevel variance estimate we used the approach of Geraci 28 where the number of pilot samples chosen across levels equals the samples chosen across model fidelities.…”
Section: Insights On Model Correlation and Optimal Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where G˜mMC is an estimate of the approximation‐model mean 𝔼[GmMC]. Pisaroni 32 uses a weighted formulation of bias and statistical error in a multilevel control variate formulation called the continuation MLMC. In this work we consider the analysis error ε to be negligibly small (similar to the work of Ng 16 and Geraci 1 ).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving away from the multi-level/multi-index paradigm, multi-fidelity methods that are based on different physical models rather than multiple discretizations have been proposed, e.g., in [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility when dealing with uncertainty quantification is the use of variable fidelity methods in combination with Multi Level Monte Carlo approaches [24,25]. However, several levels of fidelity for a given black box problem are not always available, and the number of samples required to accurately compute statistics for large scale industrial problems is still very large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%