1972
DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4050.718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent Negative Variation as an Indicator of Sexual Object Preference

Abstract: The contingent negative variation (CNV) was recorded in the interval between paired visual exposures of male nudes, female nudes, and sexually "neutral" silhouettes. Groups of 12 male and 12 female subjects viewing 50 randomized presentations from each stinmulus category responded with averaged CNV amplitudes proportional to the predicted degree of sexual interest in the stimulus classes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies Chivers et al, 2004;Suschinsky, Lalumiere, & Chivers, 2009) have demonstrated that most women possess''nonspecific'' patterns of genital arousal, such that they become aroused to both same-sex and other-sex stimuli, regardless of their own self-reported sexual orientation. This effect has been replicated in a variety of studies using other psychophysiological and behavioral measures of sexual arousal, such as electroencephalograms, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and the length of time that individuals look at erotic picture (Costa, Braun, & Birbaumer, 2003;Costell, 1972;Hamann, Herman, Nolan, & Wallen, 2004;Wright & Adams, 1999). Men, in contrast, tend to report highly gender-specific patterns of sexual arousal that correspond closely to their self-reported sexual orientation (one notable exception to this pattern is that although lesbians' genital responses to depictions of sexual activity are nonspecific, their responses to images of solitary nude figures are category-specific, such that they show substantially more arousal to female than male bodies) (Chivers, Seto, & Blanchard, 2007).…”
Section: The Importance Of Nonexclusivitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Numerous studies Chivers et al, 2004;Suschinsky, Lalumiere, & Chivers, 2009) have demonstrated that most women possess''nonspecific'' patterns of genital arousal, such that they become aroused to both same-sex and other-sex stimuli, regardless of their own self-reported sexual orientation. This effect has been replicated in a variety of studies using other psychophysiological and behavioral measures of sexual arousal, such as electroencephalograms, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and the length of time that individuals look at erotic picture (Costa, Braun, & Birbaumer, 2003;Costell, 1972;Hamann, Herman, Nolan, & Wallen, 2004;Wright & Adams, 1999). Men, in contrast, tend to report highly gender-specific patterns of sexual arousal that correspond closely to their self-reported sexual orientation (one notable exception to this pattern is that although lesbians' genital responses to depictions of sexual activity are nonspecific, their responses to images of solitary nude figures are category-specific, such that they show substantially more arousal to female than male bodies) (Chivers, Seto, & Blanchard, 2007).…”
Section: The Importance Of Nonexclusivitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…An investigation of the EEG response to same and opposite sex stimuli in men and women supports imaging findings and suggests that the women distinguish less between same and opposite sex stimuli than men do (Costell, Lunde, Kopell, & Wittner, 1972). Costell et al measured the amplitude of the contingent negative variation (CNV) wave.…”
Section: Sex Differences In Neural Response To Sexual Stimulimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The task used Costell et al's (1972) S1-S2 paradigm. Before task onset, an instruction screen asked the participants to direct their attention to the images and to remain as still as possible.…”
Section: Picture-anticipation Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is based on a design developed by Costell and colleagues to successfully differentiate sexual preference (Costell, Lunde, Kopell, & Wittner, 1972). Costell's design incorporated stimulus preceding negativity (SPN), a brain response that occurs during the anticipation of and motivation to attend to emotionally important stimuli (Hillman, Apparies, & Hatfield, 2000;Takeuchi, Mochizuki, Masaki, Takasawa, & Yamasaki, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%