2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental-scale deep electrical resistivity structure beneath China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the amplitude of the vertical magnetic field is generally reduced for a more conductive Earth (39), sites with negative misfits suggest a more conductive underlying mantle and vice versa. The misfit plot thus suggests a more conductive mantle beneath the North China Craton than the Indian Shield, which is consistent with the high-and low-conductivity anomalies beneath eastern China and western Yangtze Craton adjoining the Indian Shield, respectively (22). The coherent spatial pattern in the signed misfit implies that there are strong lateral variations in the upper and mid-mantle conductivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the amplitude of the vertical magnetic field is generally reduced for a more conductive Earth (39), sites with negative misfits suggest a more conductive underlying mantle and vice versa. The misfit plot thus suggests a more conductive mantle beneath the North China Craton than the Indian Shield, which is consistent with the high-and low-conductivity anomalies beneath eastern China and western Yangtze Craton adjoining the Indian Shield, respectively (22). The coherent spatial pattern in the signed misfit implies that there are strong lateral variations in the upper and mid-mantle conductivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Given the high sensitivity of electrical conductivity to the concentration of hydrogen in mantle minerals (6,17), reliable estimates of this physical parameter could provide valuable constraints on water content. Measurements of natural variations of geomagnetic fields, due to ionospheric and magnetospheric current systems that induce image currents deep in Earth, can be used to infer mantle electrical conductivity (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). These magnetovariational induction methods, which require accurate models of the external source fields, have been most successfully applied to long-period (> 2 day) disturbance storm time (Dst) variations, since their source can be reasonably modeled by a relatively simple magnetospheric ring current (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the multi‐resolution finite element modeling tool, we have systematically investigated the local ocean effects for several unused coastal observatories in southeast China, which were excluded from previous global EM studies (Yuan et al., 2020). Although different mesh resolutions are needed for different observatories, our model studies indicated that at least for coastal observatories in China, a mesh with 1° angular resolution is adequate for accurately modeling the local ocean effects.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Chinese Coastal Geomagnetic Observatory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the coastal geomagnetic data in northeast China have been used to constrain the mantle electrical conductivity and water content (Y. Zhang et al., 2020). However, several coastal geomagnetic observatories in southeast China (such as Quanzhou and Yongning observatories) are not used for mantle conductivity imaging (Yuan et al., 2020) due to the lack of accurately accounting for the strong local ocean effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation