2016
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental‐scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia, prey‐switching and the risk: benefit of rabbit control

Abstract: Recent analyses of geographical variation in cats’ diet across Australia have been used to highlight rabbit control as a conservation risk, on the basis that prey‐switching by cats following rabbit control is likely to threaten Australian fauna. There is no direct evidence to support that proposition. However, there is direct evidence of repeated prey‐switching due to seasonal fluctuations in uncontrolled rabbit populations, of long‐term suppression of rabbit numbers by effective rabbit control, and that reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar inverse relationships across space have been noted between the incidence of rabbits and the FOO for dasyurids and rodents in cat diet (Doherty et al 2015) and with medium‐sized mammals in the diet of dingoes (Doherty et al 2019). On face value, these diet composition data may suggest greater predation pressure on native mammals in areas subjected to rabbit control (Banks et al 1998; but see Mutze 2017), although diet composition data reveal nothing about fox density responses to rabbit control. Predator populations can be sustained at high densities due to an abundance of readily accessible prey (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar inverse relationships across space have been noted between the incidence of rabbits and the FOO for dasyurids and rodents in cat diet (Doherty et al 2015) and with medium‐sized mammals in the diet of dingoes (Doherty et al 2019). On face value, these diet composition data may suggest greater predation pressure on native mammals in areas subjected to rabbit control (Banks et al 1998; but see Mutze 2017), although diet composition data reveal nothing about fox density responses to rabbit control. Predator populations can be sustained at high densities due to an abundance of readily accessible prey (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All have focused on intensive predator control throughout large national parks (Sharp et al 2010; Moseby et al 2021). Nonetheless, because those introductions were commenced following the introduction of three biological control agents, lower rabbit numbers and habitat improvement likely contributed to successful project outcomes too (Mutze 2017; Ramsey et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNAL T he serious and negative effects of invasive fauna in Australia are not understated in the scientific literature (Davis et al 2016;Lethbridge 2016;Towerton 2016;Mutze 2017), especially for the Cane Toad (Rhinella marina; Phillips et al 2007;Shine 2010;Jolly et al 2016). Released in a failed attempt to control crop damage attributable to Greyback (Dermolepida sp.)…”
Section: O N S E R V At I O N a N D N At U R A L H I S T O R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%