Continental Perspectives on Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism

Bjarup, Jes

doi:10.1002/9780470690116.ch20

The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory 2005

DOI: 10.1002/9780470690116.ch20

|View full text |Cite

Continental Perspectives on Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism

Jes Bjarup¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Book2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 19 A complimentary statement referring to individual independence came from another German lawyer, Gustav Radbruch (1878–1949), in early 1920s the Minister of Justice in the Weimar Republic (1918–1933). He stated: “We despise the person who preaches in a sense contrary to his conviction, but we respect the judge who does not permit himself to be diverted from his loyalty to the law by his conflicting sense of the right” (quoted after Bjarup 2006 , p. 296). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Epilogue

Redo¹,

Kury²

2021

Crime Prevention and Justice in 2030

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Epilogue reflects on various interpretations and aspects of justice interwoven in the contributions to this book. Against the baseline of what is considered in the United Nations as “justice”, the text addresses first Artificial Intelligence, then goes into spiritual justice, and, finally, focuses on the secular justice as a part of its administration and delivery in Member States of the United Nations. After reflecting on these “Heavens-to-Earth” interpretations of justice, the authors formulate recommendations involving a “common language of justice.” With it the United Nations—a global ecumenical organization—celebrating its seventy-fifth anniversary may respond to the challenges involved in the implementation of the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda and beyond, as far as democracy and the rule of law are concerned. In this regard, at the domestic and international levels the coronavirus pandemic opened a new legal scenario (“the Day After”). At its heart is “Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions”—the cross-cutting goal of the 2030 Agenda.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Epilogue

Redo¹,

Kury²

2021

Crime Prevention and Justice in 2030

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

On the Alleged Problem of Legal Normativity

Schauer

2019

The Normative Force of the Factual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Continental Perspectives on Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Epilogue

Epilogue

On the Alleged Problem of Legal Normativity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About