Mentorship-Driven Talent Management 2020
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78973-691-520201002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualizing Mentoring in the Asian Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have noted the importance of the context in which the mentoring unfolds (e.g. Karcher and Nakkula, 2010; Kumar and Budhwar, 2020; Lakind et al. , 2015), but few have elaborated on what constitutes context and how context matters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other researchers have noted the importance of the context in which the mentoring unfolds (e.g. Karcher and Nakkula, 2010; Kumar and Budhwar, 2020; Lakind et al. , 2015), but few have elaborated on what constitutes context and how context matters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explaining variability in mentor role enactment Other researchers have noted the importance of the context in which the mentoring unfolds (e.g. Karcher and Nakkula, 2010;Kumar and Budhwar, 2020;Lakind et al, 2015), but few have elaborated on what constitutes context and how context matters. We define context in part based on the cues in the external environment that stood out to the mentors (Weick, 1995).…”
Section: Mentor Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though research on DWB has widened because of its direct relationship with employee performance and organisation performance (Jacobs et al , 2014), theoretical development in this phenomenon is impeded partly because of inconsistency in its conceptualisation. Several interrelated terminologies have been used to refer to the said phenomenon, for example antisocial behaviour (Giacalone and Greenberg, 1997), delinquency (Hogan and Hogan, 1989), employee theft (Greenberg, 1990; Hollinger and Clark, 1982), workplace sabotage (Analoui, 1995), organisational revenge (Bies et al , 1997), workplace incivility (Jin et al , 2020), workplace aggression (Baron and Neuman, 1996), worker resistance (Thompson and Ackroyd, 1995), cyberloafing (Lim, 2002), cyber deviancy (Weatherbee, 2010), workplace mobbing and bad behaviour in organisations (Griffin and Lopez, 2005), organisational misbehaviour (Vardi and Wiener, 1996), negative mentoring (Kumar and Budhwar, 2020; Robinson and Bennett, 1995) and counterproductive behaviour (Specter and Fox, 2005). Irrespective of the different terminologies used and different conceptualisations proposed, deviant workplace behaviour and its variant forms are simply referred to as the negative behaviours employees engage in (Nair and Bhatnagar, 2011), which needs to be managed effectively not to hurt organisational effectiveness and efficiency of those who are at the receiving end of the DWB.…”
Section: Deviant Workplace Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%