2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-008-9441-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualizing Health Outcomes: Do Effects of Network Structure Differ for Women and Men?

Abstract: Although previous research demonstrated that networks matter for health-related outcomes, few studies have investigated the possibility that network effects may differ between women and men. In a multivariate regression analysis of a US sample of 548 hurricane victims, we ask whether effects of network composition, density, and size affect perceived adequacy of social support and depressive symptoms more strongly among women than among men. We find evidence for these moderating effects, for direct effects of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Research examining the health-related benefits of social support indicate that higher levels of emotional social support are associated with higher levels of life satisfaction (Taylor, Chatters, Hardison, & Riley, 2001) and happiness (Nguyen et al, 2015; Taylor et al, 2001) among African Americans. Additionally, social support is protective against a range of mental health problems and has been linked to lowered odds of being diagnosed with depression (Chatters et al, 2015; Lincoln & Chae, 2012; Lincoln, Taylor, Chae, & Chatters, 2010; Taylor et al, 2015), anxiety (Levine, Taylor, Nguyen, Chatters, & Himle, in press; Lincoln, Taylor, Bullard, et al, 2010), fewer depressive symptoms (Haines, Beggs, & Hurlbert, 2008; Lincoln, Chatters, & Taylor, 2005), and lower levels of psychological distress (Lincoln, Chatters, & Taylor, 2003). Conversely, African Americans experiencing low levels of social support are more likely to have suicidal ideation (Lincoln, Taylor, Chatters, & Joe, 2012; Wingate et al, 2005) and to attempt suicide (Compton, Thompson, & Kaslow, 2005; Kaslow et al, 2005; Lincoln, Taylor, Chatters, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Informal Support Negative Interactions and Mental Health Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research examining the health-related benefits of social support indicate that higher levels of emotional social support are associated with higher levels of life satisfaction (Taylor, Chatters, Hardison, & Riley, 2001) and happiness (Nguyen et al, 2015; Taylor et al, 2001) among African Americans. Additionally, social support is protective against a range of mental health problems and has been linked to lowered odds of being diagnosed with depression (Chatters et al, 2015; Lincoln & Chae, 2012; Lincoln, Taylor, Chae, & Chatters, 2010; Taylor et al, 2015), anxiety (Levine, Taylor, Nguyen, Chatters, & Himle, in press; Lincoln, Taylor, Bullard, et al, 2010), fewer depressive symptoms (Haines, Beggs, & Hurlbert, 2008; Lincoln, Chatters, & Taylor, 2005), and lower levels of psychological distress (Lincoln, Chatters, & Taylor, 2003). Conversely, African Americans experiencing low levels of social support are more likely to have suicidal ideation (Lincoln, Taylor, Chatters, & Joe, 2012; Wingate et al, 2005) and to attempt suicide (Compton, Thompson, & Kaslow, 2005; Kaslow et al, 2005; Lincoln, Taylor, Chatters, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Informal Support Negative Interactions and Mental Health Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, proportion family in close network indicates the diversity of available close social support resources (e.g., Antonucci & Akiyama, 1987; Ajrouch, Antoucci, & Janevic, 2001; Fingerman & Birditt, 2003; Fast, Keating, Derksen, & Otfinowski, 2004; Haines, Beggs, & Hurlbert, 2008). For instance, an individual who has a family network size of two may be considered at risk for lacking support.…”
Section: Close Network Family Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's greater embeddeness in the social networks of other women means that, compared to men, women in dowry-supporting communities are more likely to be exposed to the dowry-related stress of others. Compared to men, women are more exposed to network members' stress and tend to be more strongly affected by network stress (Fuhrer et al 1999;Haines, Beggs, and Hurlbert 2008;House 1987;Kawachi and Berkman 2001;Kessler and McLeod 1984;Turner 1994). Although women's social networks can provide social support, prior research has found that stress in women's social networks plays a larger role in women's health than does the support in women's social networks (Kawachi and Berkman 2001;Turner and Avison 2003).…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%