Contextualizing Anti-Immigrant Attitudes of East Europeans

Abstract

This paper article examines attitudes toward immigrants by analyzing data from the 2010 and 2016 waves of the EBRD’s Life in Transition Survey among respondents from 16 East European countries. Logistic regressions with clustered standard errors and country fixed effects show significantly higher anti-immigrant sentiments after the 2015 immigration pressures on the European Union borders compared with attitudes in 2010. Almost two thirds of the respondents agreed in 2016 that immigrants represented a burden on the state social services, even when the actual immigrant population in these countries was quite small. In addition, East Europeans expressed greater negative sentiments when the issue of immigration was framed as an economic problem—a burden on state social services—than as a cultural problem—having immigrants as neighbors. On the whole, these results point to the importance of contextualizing anti-immigrant attitudes and understanding the effect of external events and the framing of immigration-related survey questions.

Anti-Immigration Attitudes in Contemporary Polish Society: A Story of Double Standards?

“…In general, those studies suggest that anti-immigration attitudes are associated with low socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with the economic situation – both on the macro-level of the economic prosperity of the country (e.g. Citrin and Sides 2008), and on the level of the personal situation of individuals (Cook et al 2012; Citrin et al 1997; Herreros and Criado 2009; Bandelj and Gibson 2020; Oliver and Mendelberg 2000; Olzak 1992; Mayda 2006; Scheve and Slaughter 2001). It is argued that nationals who are at the bottom of the labor market feel threatened by immigration because they reckon immigrants as mostly unskilled workers and cheap labor; individuals who may compete with them for work opportunities and/or welfare benefits (Espenshade and Hempstead 1996).…”

O processo colaborativo no desenvolvimento da obra “Brain Washed, Brain Dead”

“…Como dito anteriormente, Brain Washed, Brain Dead, foi montada em seis contextos diferentes. A primeira versão (versão 1), realizada em Montreal, Canadá (2016), abordava a política anti-imigração crescente em certos países da América do Norte e Europa (Zhirkov, 2020;Bandelj & Gibson, 2020). Nas versões seguintes, realizadas em Bogotá, Colômbia (2017, versão 2) e em San Juan, Argentina (2017, versão 3), a peça abordava a política e a mídia local de cada país.…”

Anti-EU Backlash from Below or Above? Public Opinion in Central and Eastern Europe Prior to the 2015 Migration Crisis

“…During and after the migration crisis, the issue of immigration in CEE was framed mainly as a cultural threat. However, due to the importance of the perception of both the economic and cultural threats regarding immigration, we analyse both dimensions, although separately (see Bandelj and Gibson, 2020). educated showing higher support for the EU), (2) identity approach (focusing on issues of national identity and national pride, with those more attached to their nations and more proud of their nations being more Eurosceptic) and (3) cue-taking approach (focusing on cues or proxies, such as political parties which help citizens form their opinion).…”