2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2016.7729859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual deep CNN based hyperspectral classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be observed that the proposed method performs better or equally well when compared with other state-ofthe art methods. More specifically, the proposed method outperforms [18] and [19] by 9.58% and 5.61% on PaviaU dataset with 4.4% training data. Similarly, our model Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can also be observed that the proposed method performs better or equally well when compared with other state-ofthe art methods. More specifically, the proposed method outperforms [18] and [19] by 9.58% and 5.61% on PaviaU dataset with 4.4% training data. Similarly, our model Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The proposed method has been trained and evaluated over PaviaC and PaviaU datasets. The performance is compared with recent state-of-the-art approaches [18,19] in terms of classification accuracy. We trained our model with different percentage of training data (4.4%, 5%, 9%, 15%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yue et al extracted image features from 46,697 hyperspectral remote sensing images containing 103 bands using a CNN approach from a pixel matrix with spectral and spatial features, and classified the features via logical regression [4]. Lee and Kwon used two convolution kernel templates of different sizes to extract a variety of remote sensing image features from 8,504 samples containing 220 bands and removed the fully-connected layer for classification purposes [5]. All of the above CNNs required numerous, manually labelled samples; as a result, personal experience likely significantly impacted the classification accuracy; furthermore, the dimensionality of the original remote sensing images was high and included considerable redundant information, which affects the efficiency of network training and impedes network learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs are typically applied in remote sensing classification efforts in two ways: pixel-based classifications [3][4][5] and scene classifications [6,7]. While there are only a few studies that address object-oriented remote sensing classification based on CNNs, the first-place winner of Dstl's Satellite Imagery competition, Kaggle, proposed a new, improved U-Net model to identify and label significant objects using satellite imagery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%