Using a conditioned suppression task, we investigated extinction and renewal of Pavlovian modulation in human sequential Feature Positive (FP) discrimination learning. In Experiment 1, in context a participants were first trained on two FP discriminations, X→A+/A− and Y→B+/B−. Extinction treatment was administered in the acquisition context a (aaa group) or in a new context b (aba group), and comprised X→A− extinction and Y− control trials. Discriminative X→A/A responding was lost in both groups when tested in the extinction context, but partially recovered in the aba and not in the aaa group when tested in the acquisition context, suggesting extinction and renewal of extinguished modulation. The same was observed for the Y→B/B control pair, however, questioning whether the loss of discriminative X→A/A responding represented genuine extinction of modulation. In Experiment 2, including only aba groups, participants were trained in context a on two FP discriminations, X→A+/A− and Y→B+/B−, after which the group "Extinction" was exposed to X→A− extinction trials in context b, whereas the group "Control" was exposed to X− control trials; concurrently, both groups received further Y→B+/B− training. In the group Control, differential Y→B/B and X→A/A responding were acquired and maintained throughout the experiment. In the group Extinction, while Y→B/B responding was also maintained throughout, differential X→A/A responding disappeared because of X→A− extinction treatment when tested in the extinction context b, but partially reappeared when tested in the acquisition context a. This evidences aba-renewal of extinguished modulation.In a Pavlovian sequential Feature Positive (FP) discrimination task, a conditioned stimulus A (the "target" stimulus) is followed by presentation of an unconditioned stimulus (US) only if target A is preceded by another stimulus X (the "feature" stimulus), hence X→A+/A.מ In animal studies, this conditioning schedule has been found to result in feature X becoming a "facilitator" or "positive occasion setter" that controls the behavioral expression of the association between the target A and the US (Holland 1992). Lamoureux et al. (1998) (see also Holland 1992) argued that such a modulatory strategy is invoked in sequential FP training because the stimulus that is crucial for an adequate resolution of the discrimination, that is, feature X, does not succeed in acquiring a direct excitatory association with the US. That is, the less valid US predictor A will, because of its relative advantage over X in terms of temporal contiguity with the US, overshadow the opportunity for the more valid cue X (or its memory trace) to acquire the required direct excitatory associative strength. In order to resolve this impasse, a strategy is deployed whereby an excitatory A-US association is formed that is modulated by feature X.Two special characteristics of occasion setters distinguish them from simple Pavlovian excitors and theoretically justify treating them as a functionally different class of Pavlovian...