2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00081-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
324
0
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
12
324
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Yukl 2013). Social cognitive research has demonstrated how schemas and implicit theories significantly influence judgements, choices, and behaviours (Ayman and Chemers 1983;Engle and Lord 1997;Fiske and Taylor 2013;Greenwald et al 2009;Hunt et al 1990;Lord et al 2001;Nye and Forsyth 1991;Porr and Fields 2006;Rush and Russell 1988;Ajzen 1991).…”
Section: Reproducing Empowering Leadership During Vocational Educatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yukl 2013). Social cognitive research has demonstrated how schemas and implicit theories significantly influence judgements, choices, and behaviours (Ayman and Chemers 1983;Engle and Lord 1997;Fiske and Taylor 2013;Greenwald et al 2009;Hunt et al 1990;Lord et al 2001;Nye and Forsyth 1991;Porr and Fields 2006;Rush and Russell 1988;Ajzen 1991).…”
Section: Reproducing Empowering Leadership During Vocational Educatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results underline the importance of being very careful with the specific questions we are asking in implicit leadership theories studies. They most certainly work as constraints in sense of Lord et al (2001) and may activate quite different aspects of our leadership beliefs.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogeneity versus heterogeneity with regard to romance of leadership may emerge as an important factor. For a more differentiated perspective Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) proposes that cognitive structures representing leadership are not static, but will be continually rebuilt as new information is available or the tasks and the context changes (Hogg, 2001;Lord, Brown, Harvey, & Hall, 2001;Lord & Emrich, 2001). Within the theoretical frame of Social Identity Theory, Haslam and Platow (2001) argue that prototypicality for the characteristics of a group explains the attribution and emergence of leadership.…”
Section: Romance Of Leadership and Decision Making 19 Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%