Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This article presents a set of nondestructive test methodologies designed to evaluate and compare performance of the communication links used for control and telemetry of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) (drones) that are operating indoors and in subterranean environments. Such a set of standardized test methodologies does not yet exist. Indoor and subterranean operation requires sUAS to operate without global positioning system and often in a spatially constrained non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication environment. Operating in constrained indoor environments puts additional constraints on the communication links and requires a set of tests to allow evaluation and comparison of different units in typical scenarios that will be encountered. Tests to measure and compare communication link performance and ability to pilot in tunnels and office type buildings with doors, walls, and other obstructions, as well as stairwells are described. The test methods consist of measuring and comparing the NLOS radio range between the sUAS and the ground control station or operator control unit (OCU), observing the sUAS behavior with partial or total communication failure. Near the edge of coverage, correlated packet loss can lead to difficulties in piloting. A methodology for evaluating video latency that is critical for remote piloting by camera only is presented. Finally, a test methodology for characterizing the effects of interference and jamming by waveforms such as Wi-Fi often encountered in buildings is described. These test methodologies described here extend standards developed for ground robots to three dimensions. The test methodologies described in this article are part of a multifaceted project that evaluates many essential elements of drone operation indoors. These include communication, navigation, collision tolerance, mapping, trust, and automation. The test methodologies are designed to be reproduced in user facilities.
This article presents a set of nondestructive test methodologies designed to evaluate and compare performance of the communication links used for control and telemetry of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) (drones) that are operating indoors and in subterranean environments. Such a set of standardized test methodologies does not yet exist. Indoor and subterranean operation requires sUAS to operate without global positioning system and often in a spatially constrained non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication environment. Operating in constrained indoor environments puts additional constraints on the communication links and requires a set of tests to allow evaluation and comparison of different units in typical scenarios that will be encountered. Tests to measure and compare communication link performance and ability to pilot in tunnels and office type buildings with doors, walls, and other obstructions, as well as stairwells are described. The test methods consist of measuring and comparing the NLOS radio range between the sUAS and the ground control station or operator control unit (OCU), observing the sUAS behavior with partial or total communication failure. Near the edge of coverage, correlated packet loss can lead to difficulties in piloting. A methodology for evaluating video latency that is critical for remote piloting by camera only is presented. Finally, a test methodology for characterizing the effects of interference and jamming by waveforms such as Wi-Fi often encountered in buildings is described. These test methodologies described here extend standards developed for ground robots to three dimensions. The test methodologies described in this article are part of a multifaceted project that evaluates many essential elements of drone operation indoors. These include communication, navigation, collision tolerance, mapping, trust, and automation. The test methodologies are designed to be reproduced in user facilities.
The current state of the art in small Unmanned Aerial System (sUAS) testing and evaluation exists mainly in the realm of outdoor flight. Operating small flying sUAS in constrained indoor or subterranean environments places different constraints on their communication links (control links and camera/sensor links). Communication loss in these environments is much more severe due to the proximity of obstacles. This paper examines how correlated packet loss (burst errors) occurring on both the control and camera communication links affects the ability of pilots to fly and navigate small sUAS platforms in constrained Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) environments. A software test bench called AirSim, a UAV simulator, allows us to better understand the effects of correlated packet loss on flyability without damaging multiple sUAS units by flight testing. The simulation was designed to support the design of test methodologies for evaluating the robustness of the communication links and to understand performance without damaging flight tests. Throughout the simulations, it is observed how different levels of packet loss affect the pilot and the number of simulated crashes into the obstacles placed through space. The simulations modeled packet loss both on the video link and the control link to display how packet loss affects ability to pilot and control the sUAS. The utility of using a simulated environment rather than flight testing prevents damage to the fragile and expensive drones being used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.