2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contexts Paired with Junk Food Impair Goal-Directed Behavior in Rats: Implications for Decision Making in Obesogenic Environments

Abstract: The high prevalence of obesity and related metabolic diseases calls for greater understanding of the factors that drive excess energy intake. Calorie-dense palatable foods are readily available and often are paired with highly salient environmental cues. These cues can trigger food-seeking and consumption in the absence of hunger. Here we examined the effects of palatable food-paired environmental cues on control of instrumental food-seeking behavior. In Experiment 1, adult male rats received exposures to one … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is also supported by the context-specificity of the deficit observed after brief morphine re-exposure, which was only apparent when rats were tested in the morphine-paired context. Interestingly, similar context-specific deficits in reward devaluation sensitivity have been observed when rats are tested in the presence of cues that predict other salient stimuli including alcohol [55], methamphetamine [77], or unrestricted access to highly-palatable junk foods [82]. Together, such findings suggest that affectively-charged environmental cues can perturb the cognitive processes responsible for goal-directed action selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This conclusion is also supported by the context-specificity of the deficit observed after brief morphine re-exposure, which was only apparent when rats were tested in the morphine-paired context. Interestingly, similar context-specific deficits in reward devaluation sensitivity have been observed when rats are tested in the presence of cues that predict other salient stimuli including alcohol [55], methamphetamine [77], or unrestricted access to highly-palatable junk foods [82]. Together, such findings suggest that affectively-charged environmental cues can perturb the cognitive processes responsible for goal-directed action selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is perhaps surprising that this aspect of decision-making is compromised following a simple change in diet given that rats exposed chronically to cocaine show relatively normal sensitivity to outcome devaluation on this same goal-directed action selection task ( 46 ). It may be that experiences consuming junk foods are particularly relevant and, therefore, have a lasting impact on how we decide which foods are worth pursuing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the tendency for junk-food diets to disrupt action selection for food reward may result from diet-related learning rather than a permanent and unconditional cognitive impairment. For instance, there is growing evidence that rats' capacity for goal-directed action selection for food rewards is acutely disrupted in the presence of contextual cues that signal access to junk food ( 46 ), an effect that has also been shown with drug-paired cues [either methamphetamine ( 47 ) or alcohol ( 48 )]. Thus, it is possible that rats given extensive junk-food exposure acquired a persistent—and perhaps less cue-dependent—expectation of having access to junk food, and that this influenced the way they made decisions about other food-seeking actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further support for the context‐dependent nature of habits comes from work showing that training for habitual responding in one context does not interfere with goal‐directed responding in another context regardless of whether the two contexts differed according to length of training (3 vs. 12 sessions, experienced sequentially) or schedule of reinforcement (RR vs. RI, experienced concurrently; Gremel & Costa, 2013; Steinfeld & Bouton, 2021). Additional evidence of context specificity comes from work showing that food responding becomes habitual in the presence of contextual cues paired with alcohol or junk food, while being goal directed in the presence of control contextual cues (Kendig et al, 2016; Ostlund et al, 2010). In sum, these data indicate that habitual learning is context dependent and that new contexts trigger a transition to goal‐directed responding.…”
Section: Behavioral Factors That Break Habitsmentioning
confidence: 99%